Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition

in Journal of Motor Learning and Development
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $41.00

1 year subscription

USD $55.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $79.00

2 year subscription

USD $103.00

With recent revisions, the evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Test of Gross Motor Development—3rd edition (TGMD-3) is necessary. The TGMD-3 was administered to 807 children (M age = 6.33 ± 2.09 years; 52.5% male). Reliability assessments found that correlations with age were moderate to large; ball skills had a higher correlation (r = .47) compared with locomotor skills (r = .39). Internal consistency was very high in each age group and remained excellent for all racial/ethnic groups and both sexes. Test-retest reliability had high ICC agreements for the locomotor (ICC = 0.97), ball skills (ICC = 0.95), and total TGMD-3 (ICC = 0.97). For validity measures, the TGMD-3 had above acceptable item difficulty (range = 0.43–0.91) and item discrimination values (range = 0.34–0.67). EFA supported a one-factor structure of gross motor skill competence for the TGMD-3 with 73.82% variance explained. CFA supported the one-factor model (χ2(65) = 327.61, p < .001, CFI = .95, TLI = .94, RMSEA = .10), showing acceptable construct validity for the TGMD-3. Preliminary results show the TGMD-3 exhibits high levels of validity and reliability, providing confidence for the usage and collection of new norms.

Webster is with the School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. Ulrich is with the School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Please address author correspondence to Kip Webster at kipwebster@lsu.edu
Journal of Motor Learning and Development
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 120 119 48
Full Text Views 8 8 3
PDF Downloads 5 5 3
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cited By