Altering Visual Feedback Conditions Impacts Postural Sway Performance in Children After Controlling for Body Mass Index and Habitual Physical Activity

in Journal of Motor Learning and Development

Click name to view affiliation

Michael DuncanCoventry University

Search for other papers by Michael Duncan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Elizabeth BryantCoventry University

Search for other papers by Elizabeth Bryant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mike PriceCoventry University

Search for other papers by Mike Price in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Samuel OxfordCoventry University

Search for other papers by Samuel Oxford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Emma EyreCoventry University

Search for other papers by Emma Eyre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Mathew HillCoventry University

Search for other papers by Mathew Hill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This study examined postural sway in children in eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions, controlling for body mass index (BMI) and physical activity (PA). Sixty two children (aged 8–11years) underwent sway assessment using computerized posturography from which 95% ellipse sway area, anterior/posterior (AP) sway, medial/lateral (ML) sway displacement and sway velocity were assessed. Six trials were performed alternatively in EO and EC. BMI (kg/m2) was determined from height and mass. PA was determined using sealed pedometry. AP amplitude (p = .038), ML amplitude (p = .001), 95% ellipse (p = .0001), and sway velocity (p = .012) were higher in EC compared with EO conditions. BMI and PA were not significant as covariates. None of the sway variables were significantly related to PA. However, sway velocity during EO (p = .0001) and EC (p = .0001) was significantly related to BMI. These results indicate that sway is poorer when vision is removed, that BMI influences sway velocity, but that pedometer-assessed PA was not associated with postural sway.

The authors are with Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Please address author correspondence to Michael Duncan at michael.duncan@coventry.ac.uk.
  • Collapse
  • Expand