Evaluation of 2 Self-Report Measures of Physical Activity With Accelerometry in Young Adults

Click name to view affiliation

John R. Sirard
Search for other papers by John R. Sirard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter Hannan
Search for other papers by Peter Hannan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gretchen J. Cutler
Search for other papers by Gretchen J. Cutler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Dianne Nuemark-Sztainer
Search for other papers by Dianne Nuemark-Sztainer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Background:

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate self-reported physical activity of young adults using 1-week and 1-year recall measures with an accelerometer as the criterion measure.

Methods:

Participants were a subsample (N = 121, 24 ± 1.7 yrs) from a large longitudinal cohort study. Participants completed a detailed 1-year physical activity recall, wore an accelerometer for 1 week and then completed a brief 1-week physical activity recall when they returned the accelerometer.

Results:

Mean values for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) from the 3 instruments were 3.2, 2.2, and 13.7 hours/wk for the accelerometer, 1-week recall, and 1-year recall, respectively (all different from each other, P < .001). Spearman correlations for moderate, vigorous, and MVPA between the accelerometer and the 1-week recall (0.30, 0.50, and 0.40, respectively) and the 1-year recall (0.31, 0.42, and 0.44, respectively) demonstrated adequate validity.

Conclusions:

Both recall instruments may be used for ranking physical activity at the group level. At the individual level, the 1-week recall performed much better in terms of absolute value of physical activity. The 1-year recall overestimated total physical activity but additional research is needed to fully test its validity.

The authors are with the Dept of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

  • Collapse
  • Expand