How Do Different Occupational Factors Influence Total, Occupational, and Leisure-Time Physical Activity?

in Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Click name to view affiliation

Corneel Vandelanotte
Search for other papers by Corneel Vandelanotte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Camille Short
Search for other papers by Camille Short in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthew Rockloff
Search for other papers by Matthew Rockloff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lee Di Millia
Search for other papers by Lee Di Millia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kevin Ronan
Search for other papers by Kevin Ronan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brenda Happell
Search for other papers by Brenda Happell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Mitch J. Duncan
Search for other papers by Mitch J. Duncan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Background:

A better understanding of how occupational indicators influence physical activity levels will aid the design of workplace interventions.

Methods:

Cross-sectional data were collected from 1194 participants through a telephone interview in Queensland, Australia. The IPAQ-long was used to measure physical activity. Multiple logistic regression was applied to examine associations.

Results:

Of participants, 77.9% were employed full-time, 32.3% had professional jobs, 35.7% were engaged in shift work, 39.5% had physically-demanding jobs, and 66.1% had high physical activity levels. Participants with a physicallydemanding job were less likely to have low total (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.38) and occupational (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.25) physical activity. Technical and trade workers were less likely to report low total physical activity (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.97) compared with white-collar workers. Part-time (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.64) and shift workers (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.88) were more likely to report low leisure-time activity.

Conclusions:

Overall, the impact of different occupational indicators on physical activity was not strong. As expected, the greatest proportion of total physical activity was derived from occupational physical activity. No evidence was found for compensation effects whereby physically-demanding occupations lead to less leisure-time physical activity or vice versa. This study demonstrates that workplaces are important settings to intervene, and that there is scope to increase leisure-time physical activity irrespective of occupational background.

Vandelanotte (c.vandelanotte@cqu.edu.au), Short, and Duncan are with the Institute for Health and Social Science, Centre for Physical Activity Studies, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia. Rockloff is with the Institute for Health and Social Science, School of Health and Human Services, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg, Australia. Di Millia is with the Institute for Health and Social Science, School of Management and Marketing, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia. Ronan is with the Institute for Health and Social Science, Centre for Longitudinal and Preventative Health Research, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia. Happell is with the Institute for Health and Social Science, Centre for Mental Health Nursing Innovation, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.

  • Collapse
  • Expand