Australia and Other Nations Are Failing to Meet Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Children: Implications and a Way Forward
in Journal of Physical Activity and HealthClick name to view affiliation
Search for other papers by Leon Straker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erin Kaye Howie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dylan Paul Cliff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Melanie T. Davern in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lina Engelen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sjaan R. Gomersall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jenny Ziviani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natasha K. Schranz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tim Olds in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Grant Ryan Tomkinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background:
Australia has joined a growing number of nations that have evaluated the physical activity and sedentary behavior status of their children. Australia received a “D minus” in the first Active Healthy Kids Australia Physical Activity Report Card.
Methods:
An expert subgroup of the Australian Report Card Research Working Group iteratively reviewed available evidence to answer 3 questions: (a) What are the main sedentary behaviors of children? (b) What are the potential mechanisms for sedentary behavior to impact child health and development? and (c) What are the effects of different types of sedentary behaviors on child health and development?
Results:
Neither sedentary time nor screen time is a homogeneous activity likely to result in homogenous effects. There are several mechanisms by which various sedentary behaviors may positively or negatively affect cardiometabolic, neuromusculoskeletal, and psychosocial health, though the strength of evidence varies. National surveillance systems and mechanistic, longitudinal, and experimental studies are needed for Australia and other nations to improve their grade.
Conclusions:
Despite limitations, available evidence is sufficiently convincing that the total exposure and pattern of exposure to sedentary behaviors are critical to the healthy growth, development, and wellbeing of children. Nations therefore need strategies to address these common behaviors.
Straker is with the School of Physiotherapy; Howie (erin.howie@curtin.edu.au) is with the School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia. Cliff is with the School of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. Davern is with the School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Engelen is with the Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. Gomersall is with CrexPAH, School of Human Movement Studies; Ziviani is with the School of Health Rehabilitation Sciences; University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Schranz, Olds, and Tomkinson are with the Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
© 2023 Human Kinetics