Validating and Shortening the Environmental Assessment of Public Recreation Spaces Observational Measure

in Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Click name to view affiliation

Carrie M. Geremia
Search for other papers by Carrie M. Geremia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Kelli L. Cain
Search for other papers by Kelli L. Cain in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Terry L. Conway
Search for other papers by Terry L. Conway in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
James F. Sallis
Search for other papers by James F. Sallis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Brian E. Saelens
Search for other papers by Brian E. Saelens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2018-0142
Keywords:
built environment; evidence-based research; measurement; physical activity
In Print:
Volume 16: Issue 1
Page Range:
68–75
Restricted access

Background: Assessment of park characteristics that may support physical activity (PA) can guide the design of more activity-supportive parks. Direct-observation measures are seldom used due to time and resource restraints. Methods: The authors developed shortened versions of the original Environmental Assessment of Public Recreation Spaces (EAPRS) tool and tested their construct validity by comparing scores from 40 parks in San Diego, CA to observe park use and PA. Results: PA elements were positively associated with park use and park PA across all versions, with the highest correlations for trails (.45 for use and .51 for PA using EAPRS-Original; .57 use and .62 PA using Abbreviated; and .38 use and .43 PA using Mini). Presence of amenities, using Abbreviated and Mini versions, was correlated with park use (.71, .64) and PA (.67, .59). The overall park quality score using Abbreviated and Mini had similar correlations (adjusted for park size) with park use (.74, .72) and PA (.72, .70) as EAPRS-Original (.71 use and .73 PA). Conclusion: In all 3 versions, EAPRS overall park scores were strongly related to observed park use and PA. Shorter versions of EAPRS make it more feasible to use park observations in research and practice.

Geremia, Cain, Conway, and Sallis are with the Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Saelens is with the Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Geremia (cgeremia@ucsd.edu) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Cover Journal of Physical Activity and Health
  • 1.

    Ding DS, Sallis JF, Kerr J, Lee S, Rosenberg DE. Neighborhood environment and physical activity among youth: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(4):442–455. PubMed ID: 21961474 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.036

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Lee AC, Maheswaran R. The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J Public Health, 2011;33(2):212–222. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdq068

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leis Sci. 2007;29(4):315–354. doi:10.1080/01490400701394865

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE. Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1451–1456. PubMed ID: 18556600 doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.129064

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Veitch J, Carver A, Abbott G, Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Salmon J. How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:610. PubMed ID: 26141112 doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Kneeshaw-Price S, Saelens BE, Sallis JF, et al. Children’s objective physical activity by location: why the neighborhood matters. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2013;25(3):468–486. PubMed ID: 23877357 doi:10.1123/pes.25.3.468

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Stewart OT, Moudon AV, Fesinmeyer MD, Zhou C, Saelens BE. The association between park visitation and physical activity measured with accelerometer, GPS, and travel diary. Health Place. 2016;38:82–88. PubMed ID: 26798965 doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.01.004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Bancroft C, Joshi S, Rundle A, et al. Association of proximity and density of parks and objectively measured physical activity in the United States: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2015;138:22–30. PubMed ID: 26043433 doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05034

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Han B, Cohen D, McKenzie TL. Quantifying the contribution of neighborhood parks to physical activity. Prev Med. 2013;57(5):483–487. PubMed ID: 23827723 doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.021

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Kaczynski AT, Besenyi GM, Stanis SA, et al. Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:146. PubMed ID: 25480157 doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0146-4

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Boccaro JN, Floyd MF, Smith WR, et al. Social and environmental factors related to boys’ and girls’ park-based physical activity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:140532. doi:10.5888/pcd12.140532

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Cohen DA, Han B, Nagel CJ, et al. The first national study of neighborhood parks: implications for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(4):419–426. PubMed ID: 27209496 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.021

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Floyd MF, Bocarro JN, Smith WR, et al. Park-based physical activity among children and adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(3):258–265. PubMed ID: 21855739 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Edwards N, Hooper P, Knuiman M, Foster S, Giles-Corti B. Associations between park features and adolescent park use for physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:21. doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0178-4

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Bedimo-Rung AL, Gustat J, Tompkins BJ, Rice J, Thomson J. Development of a direct observation instrument to measure environmental characteristics of parks for physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3:176. PubMed ID: 28834515 doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s176

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Broomhall M, Giles-Corti B, Lange A. Quality of Public Open Space Tool (POST). Perth, Australia: School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia; 2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Saelens BE, Frank LD, Auffrey C, Whitaker RC, Burdette HL, Colabianchi N. Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds: EAPRS instrument development and inter-rater reliability. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3(s1):S190–207. PubMed ID: 28834520 doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s190

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Lee RE, Booth KM, Reese-Smith JY, Regan G, Howard HH. The physical activity resource assessment (PARA) instrument: evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2(1):13. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-2-13

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Kaczynski AT, Stanis SA, Besenyi GM. Development and testing of a community stakeholder park audit tool. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(3):242–249. PubMed ID: 22341161 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.018

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Joseph RP, Maddock JE. Comparative analysis of five observational audit tools to assess the physical environment of parks for physical activity. Prev Chronic Dis, 2016;13:E166. PubMed ID: 27978411 doi:10.5888/pcd13.160176

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Kaczynski AT, Havitz ME. Examining the relationship between proximal park features and residents’ physical activity in neighborhood parks. J Park Recreat Adm. 2009;27(3):42–58.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Frank LD, Saelens BE, Chapman J, et al. Objective assessment of obesogenic environments in youth: geographic information system methods and spatial findings from the neighborhood impact on kids study. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):e47–e55. PubMed ID: 22516503 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2):159–168. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Saelens BE. EAPRS full tool scoring rationale. http://www.seattlechildrens.org/research/child-health-behavior-and-development/saelens-lab/measures-and-protocols/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    McKenzie TL, Cohen DA, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D. System for observing play and recreation in communities (SOPARC): reliability and feasibility measures. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3:S208. PubMed ID: 28834508 doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Cohen DA, Setodji C, Evenson KR, et al. How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(8):1117–1123. PubMed ID: 22039130 doi:10.1123/jpah.8.8.1117

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Engelberg JK, Conway TL, Geremia C, et al. Socioeconomic and race/ethnic disparities in observed park quality. BMC Pub Health. 2016;16:395. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3055-4

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating more physically active communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322. PubMed ID: 16533119 doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2723 1282 25
Full Text Views 36 10 1
PDF Downloads 28 10 2