An Evaluation of Participant Perspectives and Wear-Time Compliance for a Wrist-Worn Versus Thigh-Worn Accelerometer in Cancer Survivors

in Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Click name to view affiliation

Mary C. HiddeMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Search for other papers by Mary C. Hidde in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-1551*
,
Mary E. CrisafioColorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Search for other papers by Mary E. Crisafio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Emma GomesColorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Search for other papers by Emma Gomes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kate LydenKAL Consulting LLC, Denver, CO, USA

Search for other papers by Kate Lyden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Heather J. LeachColorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA

Search for other papers by Heather J. Leach in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-2225
Restricted access

Background: Accelerometers are frequently used to measure free-living physical activity and sleep in cancer survivors. To obtain valid data, participants must adhere to wear-time guidelines; therefore, understanding survivor’s preference may be critical when selecting an accelerometer. This study compared cancer survivors’ reported discomfort and interference, and wear-time compliance between a wrist-worn accelerometer and a thigh-worn accelerometer. Methods: This was a secondary data analysis. Cancer survivors (N = 52, mean age = 51.8 [13.0], 82.3% female) wore the Actiwatch-2 (wrist) and the activPAL (thigh) for 7 days, 24 hours per day. On day 7, participants completed a questionnaire to evaluate each accelerometer using a 1 to 5 Likert scale and open-ended questions. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test evaluated differences in discomfort and interference. Paired samples t test evaluated differences in wear-time compliance. Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis methods. Results: No differences were observed in discomfort, interference, or wear-time compliance (P = .08). Qualitative analysis resulted in 2 themes: discomfort and ease of use and interference and adverse reaction. Interferences were primarily reported with the Actiwatch-2, whereas discomfort and ease were primarily reported with the activPAL. Conclusion: No significant differences were observed regarding discomfort, interference, and compliance. Results of this study can prepare researchers for common issues regarding accelerometer compliance, allowing researchers to offer resources to alleviate discomforts or interferences that may affect wear-time compliance.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Chen KY. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(13):10191023. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Ferioli M, Zauli G, Martelli AM, et al. Impact of physical exercise in cancer survivors during and after antineoplastic treatments. Oncotarget. 2018;9(17):1400514034. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24456

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Hidde MC, Leach HJ, Marker RJ, Peters JC, Purcell WT. Effects of a clinic-based exercise program on sleep disturbance among cancer survivors. Integr Cancer Ther. 2020;19:153473542097585. doi:10.1177/1534735420975852

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Otte JL, Carpenter JS, Manchanda S, et al. Systematic review of sleep disorders in cancer patients: can the prevalence of sleep disorders be ascertained? Cancer Med. 2015;4(2):183200. doi:10.1002/cam4.356

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Peddle-McIntyre CJ, Cavalheri V, Boyle T, et al. A review of accelerometer-based activity monitoring in cancer survivorship research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(9):17901801. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001644

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    McGrath R, Vella CA, Scruggs PW, Peterson MD, Williams CJ, Paul DR. The impact of low accelerometer wear time on the estimates and application of sedentary behavior and physical activity data in adults. J Phys Act Health. 2017;14(12):919924. doi:10.1123/jpah.2016-0584

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Duncan S, Stewart T, Mackay L, et al. Wear-time compliance with a dual-accelerometer system for capturing 24-h behavioural profiles in children and adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1296. doi:10.3390/ijerph15071296

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Howie EK, Straker LM. Rates of attrition, non-compliance and missingness in randomized controlled trials of child physical activity interventions using accelerometers: a brief methodological review. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(10):830836. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.520

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM Jr, et al. Improving wear time compliance with a 24-hour waist-worn accelerometer protocol in the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):11. doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0172-x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Zhang Z, Giordani B, Margulis A, Chen W. Efficacy and acceptability of using wearable activity trackers in older adults living in retirement communities: a mixed method study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):231. doi:10.1186/s12877-022-02931-w

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Montoye AHK, Pivarnik JM, Mudd LM, Biswas S, Pfeiffer KA. Validation and comparison of accelerometers worn on the hip, thigh, and wrists for measuring physical activity and sedentary behavior. AIMS Public Health. 2016;3(2):298312. doi:10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.298

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Hidde MC, Lyden K, Henry K, Leach HJ. Reallocating time to physical activity and sleep: associations with quality of life in cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(9):75277534. doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07187-z

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    PAL Technologies Ltd. ActivPAL Operating Guide. PAL Technologies Ltd; 2010. www.palt.com.

  • 14.

    Kinesio Holding Corporation. WHAT IS KINESIO® TAPE? Kinesio Tape. 2022. ∼https://kinesiotape.com/what-is-kinesio-tape/#:∼:text=Kinesio%C2%AE%20is%20the%20original,for%20days%20at%20a%20time.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Philips Respironics Sleep and Respiratory Care Devices. Actiwatch 2: activity monitor. 2021. https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/product/HC1044809/actiwatch-2-activity-monitor.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Lee PH, Suen LK. The convergent validity of Actiwatch 2 and ActiGraph link accelerometers in measuring total sleeping period, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency in free-living condition. Sleep Breath. 2017;21(1):209215. doi:10.1007/s11325-016-1406-0

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Lyden K, Keadle SK, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. The activPALTM accurately classifies activity intensity categories in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(5):10221028. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001177

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Savin-Baden M, Major CH. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge; 2013.

  • 19.

    Duncan MJ, Roscoe CMP, Faghy M, Tallis J, Eyre ELJ. Estimating physical activity in children aged 8–11 years using accelerometry: contributions from fundamental movement skills and different accelerometer placements. Front Physiol. 2019;10:242. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00242

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    van Hees VT, Renstrom F, Wright A, et al. Estimation of daily energy expenditure in pregnant and non-pregnant women using a wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometer. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22922. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022922

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Hartley P, Keevil VL, Westgate K, et al. Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in older patients admitted to hospital. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2018;2018:3280240. doi:10.1155/2018/3280240

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH. Factors associated with participant compliance in studies using accelerometers. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):912917. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.018

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 463 463 32
Full Text Views 25 25 4
PDF Downloads 40 40 6