The Socioeconomic Paradox of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Europe

in Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Click name to view affiliation

Antonio Moreno-Llamas Public Health and Epidemiology Research Group, San Javier Campus, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain

Search for other papers by Antonio Moreno-Llamas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-4806
,
Jesús García-Mayor Public Health and Epidemiology Research Group, San Javier Campus, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain

Search for other papers by Jesús García-Mayor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7212-1974
, and
Ernesto De la Cruz-Sánchez Public Health and Epidemiology Research Group, San Javier Campus, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain

Search for other papers by Ernesto De la Cruz-Sánchez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-7058 *
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2022-0036
Keywords:
social determinants; inequality; lifestyle; epidemiology; public health
First Published Online:
20 Jan 2023
In Print:
Volume 20: Issue 3
Page Range:
193–203
Restricted access

Background: A low socioeconomic status (SES) presents lower physical activity; however, the relationship between SES and sedentary behavior (SB) remains unclear. We aimed to assess this association of SES with physical activity (PA) and SB. Methods: We employed representative self-reported data of the European Union from the cross-sectional survey Eurobarometer 2017, comprising a final sample of 13,708 citizens (18–64 y old), to assess the association of SES (education, occupation, and economic issues) with PA and sitting time quartiles, and to describe inequalities in vigorous, moderate, and walking activity and sitting time. Results: Multinomial regressions revealed that people from higher SESs were more likely to report higher PA; nonetheless, higher educational attainment and occupations were also associated with higher sitting time but not with lower economic issues. The inequality, shown by Gini coefficients, describes a socioeconomic gradient in vigorous and moderate activity, from higher inequality in lower statuses to lower inequality in higher statuses. The Gini coefficients also indicated higher socioeconomic inequalities in PA than SB. Conclusions: Higher SESs showed paradoxically more PA and SB; however, sitting time presented smaller differences and a more homogeneous distribution across the population.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Figure S1 (PDF 300 KB)
    • Supplementary Figure S2 (PDF 403 KB)
    • Supplementary Figure S3 (PDF 359 KB)
    • Supplementary Figure S4 (PDF 303 KB)
    • Supplementary Figure S5 (PDF 299 KB)
    • Supplementary Figure S6 (PDF 308 KB)
    • Supplementary Figure S7 (PDF 305 KB)
    • Supplementary Figure S8 (PDF 562 KB)
    • Supplementary Figure S9 (PDF 443 KB)
    • Supplementary Material S1 (PDF 176 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Cover Journal of Physical Activity and Health
  • 1.

    Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294–305. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077–e1086. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Ding D, Mutrie N, Bauman A, Pratt M, Hallal PRC, Powell KE. Physical activity guidelines 2020: comprehensive and inclusive recommendations to activate populations. Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1780–1782. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32229-7

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996–2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):207–215. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55(11):2895–2905. doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2677-z

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1302–1310. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, et al. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080000

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Patel AV, Bernstein L, Deka A, et al. Leisure time spent sitting in relation to total mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(4):419–429. doi:10.1093/aje/kwq155

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M, et al. Sedentary behavior and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(9):811–829. doi:10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Stamatakis E, Gale J, Bauman A, Ekelund U, Hamer M, Ding D. Sitting time, physical activity, and risk of mortality in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(16):2062–2072. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.031

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4570. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4570

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    García-Mayor J, Moreno-Llamas A, De la Cruz-Sánchez E. High educational attainment redresses the effect of occupational social class on health-related lifestyle: findings from four Spanish national health surveys. Ann Epidemiol. 2021;58:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.02.010

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Owen N, Sugiyama T, Eakin EE, Gardiner PA, Tremblay MS, Sallis JF. Adults’ sedentary behavior: determinants and interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):189–196. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.013

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    O’Donoghue G, Kennedy A, Puggina A, et al. Socio-economic determinants of physical activity across the life course: a “DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity” (DEDIPAC) umbrella literature review. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190737. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190737

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Varo JJ, Martínez-González MA, De Irala-Estévez J, Kearney J, Gibney M, Martínez JA. Distribution and determinants of sedentary lifestyles in the European Union. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(1):138–146. doi:10.1093/ije/dyg018

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Oftedal S, Vandelanotte C, Duncan MJ. Patterns of diet, physical activity, sitting and sleep are associated with socio-demographic, behavioral, and health-risk indicators in adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13):2375. doi:10.3390/ijerph16132375

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Moreno-Llamas A, García-Mayor J, De la Cruz-Sánchez E. Physical activity barriers according to social stratification in Europe. Int J Public Health. 2020;65:1477–1484. doi:10.1007/s00038-020-01488-y

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Staiano AE, Harrington DM, Barreira TV, Katzmarzyk PT. Sitting time and cardiometabolic risk in US adults: associations by sex, race, socioeconomic status and activity level. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(3):213–219. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091896

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Wallmann-Sperlich B, Bucksch J, Schneider S, Froboese I. Socio-demographic, behavioral and cognitive correlates of work-related sitting time in German men and women. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1259. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1259

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Wallmann-Sperlich B, Bucksch J, Hansen S, Schantz P, Froboese I. Sitting time in Germany: an analysis of socio-demographic and environmental correlates. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):196. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-196

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Milton K, Gale J, Stamatakis E, Bauman A. Trends in prolonged sitting time among European adults: 27 country analysis. Prev Med. 2015;77:11–16. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.016

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247–257. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    STROBE Statement. STROBE Statement – checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies (© STROBE Initiative). Int J Public Health. 2008;53(1):3–4. doi:10.1007/s00038-007-0239-9

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    European Commission. Eurobarometer 88.4. TNS Opinion, Brussels. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. GESIS; 2017. doi:10.4232/1.13065

  • 25.

    Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–1395. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Kino S, Bernabé E, Sabbah W. Socioeconomic inequality in clusters of health-related behaviors in Europe: latent class analysis of a cross-sectional European survey. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:497. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4440-3

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Chan TW, Goldthorpe JH. Class and status: the conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. Am Sociol Rev. 2007;72(4):512–532. doi:10.1177/000312240707200402

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Domingo-Salvany A, Bacigalupe A, Carrasco JM, Espelt A, Ferrando J, Borrell C. Propuestas de clase social neoweberiana y neomarxista a partir de la Clasificación Nacional de Ocupaciones 2011. Gac Sanit. 2013;27(3):263–272. doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.12.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Geyer S, Hemström Ö, Peter R, Vågerö D. Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(9):804–810. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.041319

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Stamatakis E, Grunseit AC, Coombs N, et al. Associations between socio-economic position and sedentary behavior in a large population sample of Australian middle and older-aged adults: The Social, Economic, and Environmental Factor (SEEF) study. Prev Med. 2014;63:72–80. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Strain T, Wijndaele K, Garcia L, et al. Levels of domain-specific physical activity at work, in the household, for travel and for leisure among 327 789 adults from 104 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1488–1497. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-102601

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Scholes S, Mindell JS. Inequalities in participation and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: a pooled analysis of the cross-sectional health surveys for England 2008, 2012, and 2016. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):361. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08479-x

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Straker L, Holtermann A, Lee I-M, van der Beek AJ, Stamatakis E. Privileging the privileged: the public health focus on leisure time physical activity has contributed to widening socioeconomic inequalities in health. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(10):525–526. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-103356

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Beenackers MA, Kamphuis CB, Giskes K, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:116. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-116

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Van Uffelen JGZ, Heesch KC, Brown W. Correlates of sitting time in working age Australian women: who should be targeted with interventions to decrease sitting time? J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(2):270–287. doi:10.1123/jpah.9.2.270

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Chey T, Bauman AE. Cross-sectional associations between occupational and leisure-time sitting, physical activity and obesity in working adults. Prev Med. 2012;54(3–4):195–200. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.020

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    McNeill LH, Kreuter MW, Subramanian SV. Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and evidence. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(4):1011–1022. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.012

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Moreno-Llamas A, García-Mayor J, De la Cruz-Sánchez E. How Europeans move: a moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sitting time paradox in the European Union. Public Health. 2022;203:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.016

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Bláfoss R, Micheletti JK, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Bay H, Andersen LL. Is fatigue after work a barrier for leisure-time physical activity? Cross-sectional study among 10,000 adults from the general working population. Scand J Public Health. 2019;47(3):383–391. doi:10.1177/1403494818765894

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Holtermann A, Krause N, Van Der Beek AJ, Straker L. The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(3):149–150. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097965

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 583 583 105
Full Text Views 857 857 0
PDF Downloads 743 743 0