Single Versus Multiple Item Questions on Occupational Physical Activity
Click name to view affiliation
Search for other papers by Michelle M. Yore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Heather R. Bowles in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Barbara E. Ainsworth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Caroline A. Macera in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harold W. Kohl III in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background:
In 2002, the National Physical Activity and Weight Loss Survey asked two sets of questions on occupational physical activity—one question from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and eight detailed questions from the occupational physical activity questionnaire (OPAQ). This study compares the responses.
Methods:
On the basis of percentage of occupational physical activity reported on OPAQ, 5847 respondents were classified by three levels (sitting or standing, walking, and heavy labor). Kappa, MET-min per day, and median hours worked at the three levels were calculated to compare the two sets of questions.
Results:
Levels of occupational physical activity reported on the BRFSS question agreed with OPAQ (kappa = 0.56). Hours of heavy labor per day reported on OPAQ increased among the three activity levels on BRFSS.
Conclusions:
The BRFSS question and OPAQ classify respondents similarly by occupational physical activity. The BRFSS question is useful for overview and OPAQ, for more detailed analyses.
Yore and Kohl are with the Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341. Bowles is with the NSW Centre for Physical Activity and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia. Ainsworth is with the Dept of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182. Macera is with the Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182.
© 2023 Human Kinetics