Comparison of 3 Different Analytic Approaches for Determining Risk-Related Active and Sedentary Behavioral Patterns in Adolescents

in Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Click name to view affiliation

Michael W. Beets
Search for other papers by Michael W. Beets in
Current site
Google Scholar
John T. Foley
Search for other papers by John T. Foley in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access


Much of the research conducted to date implies overweight youth exhibit uniform active and sedentary behavioral patterns. This approach negates the possibility that multiple co-occurring, and seemingly contrasting, behaviors may manifest within the same individual. We present a substantive dialogue on alternative analytical approaches to identifying risk-related active/sedentary behavioral patterns associated with overweight in adolescents.


Comparisons were made among latent profile analysis (LPA), cluster analysis (CA), and multinomial logistic regression (MLR). A cross sectional sample of youth (N = 6603; 12−18 yrs) completed a questionnaire assessing: physical activity (PA); competing activities (COMP); and sedentary activities (SED). Demographics associated with PA (age, sex, BMI) were used as covariates/predictors.


Comparisons among methods revealed that LPA and CA detected subgroupings of behavioral patterns associated with overweight, each unique in regards to behaviors and demographic characteristics, whereas MLR results followed established associations of low PA and high SED without subgroup separation.


Use of LPA and CA provides a rich understanding of behavioral patterns and the related demographic characteristics. Decisions guiding the selection of analytical techniques are discussed.

Beets is with the Dept of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC. Foley is with the Dept of Physical Education, SUNY Cortland, NY.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1725 734 66
Full Text Views 20 4 0
PDF Downloads 16 5 0