Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $115.00

1 year subscription

USD $153.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $218.00

2 year subscription

USD $285.00

Background: Physical activity and exercise appear to benefit patients receiving preoperative treatment for cancer. Supports and barriers must be considered to increase compliance with home-based exercise prescriptions in this setting. Such influences have not been previously examined. Methods: The authors used quantitative and qualitative methods to examine potential physical activity influences among patients who were prescribed home-based aerobic and strengthening exercises concurrent with preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer. Physical activity was measured using exercise logs and accelerometers. Social support for exercise and perceived neighborhood walkability were measured using validated surveys. Relationships between influences and physical activity were evaluated using linear regression analyses and qualitative interviews. Results: Fifty patients received treatment for a mean of 16 (9) weeks prior to planned surgical resection. Social support from friends and neighborhood esthetics were positively associated with physical activity (P < .05). In interviews, patients confirmed the importance of these influences and cited encouragement from health care providers and desire to complete and recover from treatment as additional motivators. Conclusions: Interpersonal and environmental motivators of exercise and physical activity must be considered in the design of future home-based exercise interventions designed for patients receiving preoperative therapy for cancer.

Parker and Basen-Engquist are with the Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. R.E. Lee is with the Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ. O’Connor is with the Department of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, TX. Ngo-Huang is with the Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Petzel, J.E. Lee, Tzeng, and Katz are with the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Schadler is with the Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Wang and Xiao are with the Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Fogelman is with the Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Simpson is with the Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; the Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and the Department of Immunobiology, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. Fleming is with the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL. Sahai is with the Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Parker (nhparker@mdanderson.org) is corresponding author.
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Article Sections
References
  • 1.

    Cooper ABHolmes HMdes Bordes JKet al. Role of neoadjuvant therapy in the multimodality treatment of older patients with pancreatic cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(1):111120. PubMed ID: 24856952 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Guinan EMDoyle SLBennett AEet al. Sarcopenia during neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer: characterising the impact on muscle strength and physical performance. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(5):15691576. PubMed ID: 29197960.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Prakash LRKatz MHG. Multimodality management of borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Chin Clin Oncol. 2017;6(3):27. PubMed ID: 28705004 doi:

  • 4.

    Cloyd JMChen HCWang Xet al. Chemotherapy versus chemoradiation as preoperative therapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score adjusted analysis. Pancreas. 2019;48(2):216222. PubMed ID: 30629022 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Cedermark BDahlberg MGlimelius BPahlman LRutqvist LEWilking N. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(14):980987. PubMed ID: 9091798 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Yoshikawa TRino YYukawa NOshima TTsuburaya AMasuda M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Japan: a standing position by comparing with adjuvant chemotherapy. Surg Today. 2014;44(1):1121. PubMed ID: 23508452 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Loughney LWest MAKemp GJGrocott MPJack S. Exercise intervention in people with cancer undergoing neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(1):2838. PubMed ID: 26506862 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Antoun SBorget ILanoy E. Impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis and treatment toxicities in patients diagnosed with cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013;7(4):383389. PubMed ID: 24189893 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Cooper ABSlack RFogelman Det al. Characterization of anthropometric changes that occur during neoadjuvant therapy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):24162423. PubMed ID: 25519927 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Cooper ABTzeng CWKatz MH. Treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2013;14(3):293310. PubMed ID: 23793524 doi:

  • 11.

    Sahai SKIsmail H. Perioperative implications of neoadjuvant therapies and optimization strategies for cancer surgery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2015;5(3):305317. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Ngo-Huang AParker NHWang Xet al. Home-based exercise during preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402(8):11751185. PubMed ID: 28710540 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    McLeroy KRBibeau DSteckler AGlanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351377. PubMed ID: 3068205 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):282298. PubMed ID: 10159709 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Sallis JFOwen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz KRimer BKLewis FM eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002:462484.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Spence JCLee RE. Toward a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psych Sport Exerc. 2003;4(1):724. doi:

  • 17.

    Lee REMedina AVMama SKet al. Health is power: an ecological, theory-based health intervention for women of color. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011;32(6):916923. PubMed ID: 21782975 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Glanz KMullis RM. Environmental interventions to promote healthy eating: a review of models, programs, and evidence. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):395415. PubMed ID: 3068206 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Lee RECubbin C. Striding toward social justice: the ecologic milieu of physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37(1):1017. PubMed ID: 19098519 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Hardcastle SJCohen PA. Effective physical activity promotion to survivors of cancer is likely to be home based and to require oncologist participation. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(32):36353637. PubMed ID: 28915086 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Hardcastle SJMaxwell-Smith CKamarova SLamb SMillar LCohen PA. Factors influencing non-participation in an exercise program and attitudes towards physical activity amongst cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(4):12891295. PubMed ID: 29090387 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Barber FD. Effects of social support on physical activity, self-efficacy, and quality of life in adult cancer survivors and their caregivers. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013;40(5):481489. PubMed ID: 23989022 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Estabrooks PAAllen KSmith EKrippendorf BParks SL. Evaluating physical activity behavior change programs and practices. In: Nigg CR ed. ACSM’s Behavioral Aspects of Physical Activity and ExercisePhiladelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Carlson JASallis JFConway TLet al. Interactions between psychosocial and built environment factors in explaining older adults’ physical activity. Prev Med. 2012;54(1):6873. PubMed ID: 22027402 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Franke TTong CAshe MCMcKay HSims-Gould J. The secrets of highly active older adults. J Aging Stud. 2013;27(4):398409. PubMed ID: 24300060 doi:

  • 26.

    Pinto BMTrunzo JJReiss PShiu SY. Exercise participation after diagnosis of breast cancer: trends and effects on mood and quality of life. Psychooncology. 2002;11(5):389400. PubMed ID: 12228872 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Midtgaard JRorth MStelter RAdamsen L. The group matters: an explorative study of group cohesion and quality of life in cancer patients participating in physical exercise intervention during treatment. Euro J Cancer Care. 2006;15(1):2533. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Arvidsson DKawakami NOhlsson HSundquist K. Physical activity and concordance between objective and perceived walkability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(2):280287. PubMed ID: 21716148 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Gebel KBauman AOwen N. Correlates of non-concordance between perceived and objective measures of walkability. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(2):228238. PubMed ID: 19396503 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Keegan THShariff-Marco SSangaramoorthy Met al. Neighborhood influences on recreational physical activity and survival after breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25(10):12951308. PubMed ID: 25088804 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Lynch BMOwen NHawkes ALAitken JF. Perceived barriers to physical activity for colorectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(6):729734. PubMed ID: 19636595 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Parker NHNgo-Huang ALee REet al. Physical activity and exercise during preoperative pancreatic cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(6):22752284. PubMed ID: 30334105 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Stathi AGilbert HFox KRCoulson JDavis MThompson JL. Determinants of neighborhood activity of adults age 70 and over: a mixed-methods study. J Aging Phys Act. 2012;20(2):148170. PubMed ID: 22472577 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    British Columbia Ministry of Health. Physical Activity Readiness QuestionnaireBritish Columbia, Canada: Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology; 1992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Garcia SFCella DClauser SBet al. Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(32):51065112. PubMed ID: 17991929 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Brown JKByers TDoyle Cet al. Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: an American Cancer Society guide for informed choices. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(5):268291. PubMed ID: 14570227 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    McTiernan A. Obesity and cancer: the risks, science, and potential management strategies. Oncology. 2005;19(7):871881.

  • 38.

    Schmitz KHCourneya KSMatthews Cet al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(7):14091426. PubMed ID: 20559064 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Sallis JFGrossman RMPinski RBPatterson TLNader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987;16(6):825836. PubMed ID: 3432232 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Saelens BESallis JFBlack JBChen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9):15521558. PubMed ID: 12948979 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Cerin ESaelens BESallis JFFrank LD. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: validity and development of a short form. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(9):16821691. PubMed ID: 16960531 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Cerin EConway TLSaelens BEFrank LDSallis JF. Cross-validation of the factorial structure of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) and its abbreviated form (NEWS-A). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6(1):32. PubMed ID: 19508724 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Sonderman JSMumma MTCohen SSCope ELBlot WJSignorello LB. A multi-stage approach to maximizing geocoding success in a large population-based cohort study through automated and interactive processes. Geospat Health. 2012;6(2):273284. PubMed ID: 22639129 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Sallis JFSaelens BEFrank LDet al. Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(7):12851293. PubMed ID: 19232809 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. In: Vasta R ed. Annals of Child Development. Vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1989:160.

  • 46.

    Basen-Engquist KCarmack CLPerkins Het al. Design of the steps to health study of physical activity in survivors of endometrial cancer: testing a social cognitive theory model. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12(1):2735. PubMed ID: 21218163 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Stacey FGJames ELChapman KCourneya KSLubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(2):305338. PubMed ID: 25432633 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Katz MHCrane CHVaradhachary G. Management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24(2):105112. PubMed ID: 24635867 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Katz MHPisters PWEvans DBet al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):833846. PubMed ID: 18471707 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Badgwell BDas PAjani J. Treatment of localized gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: the role of accurate staging and preoperative therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):149. PubMed ID: 28810883 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Elliot AHMartling AGlimelius BNordenvall CJohansson HNilsson PJ. Preoperative treatment selection in rectal cancer: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(12):17821788. PubMed ID: 25260598 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Samdal GBEide GEBarth TWilliams GMeland E. Effective behaviour change techniques for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight and obese adults; systematic review and meta-regression analyses. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):42. PubMed ID: 28351367 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Trinh LLarsen KFaulkner GEet al. Social-ecological correlates of physical activity in kidney cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(1):164175. PubMed ID: 26048546 doi:

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 350 350 135
Full Text Views 15 15 7
PDF Downloads 5 5 2
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar