Effect of Self-Monitoring Strategies and Task Complexity on Motor Performance and Affect

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
View More View Less
  • 1 Science Works International Sport Psychology Consulting, Sydney
  • 2 University of Wollongong
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $85.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $114.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $162.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $216.00

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effect of self-monitoring (SM) strategies on motor performance of varied difficulty. In a pilot test, participants’ perceptions of task difficulty agreed with performance on the easy task. Participants perceived the hard task to be significantly more difficult than indicated by the performance scores and perceived the easy task to be significantly less difficult than their performance on the complex task (p < .05). In the subsequent experiment, subjects performed 90 trials on either the difficult or easy motor task using either positive self-monitoring (PSM), negative self-monitoring (NSM), or no self-monitoring. MANOVAs indicated that PSM resulted in superior performance in comparison to NSM across trials while performing the difficult task (p < .05). In the easy task, PSM was inferior to NSM on motor performance across trials (p < .01). Further results also indicated that negative affect significantly decreased for PSM performing the difficult task, and for NSM performing the easy task.

Michael B. Martin currently is in private practice at 219 President Ave., Miranda, New South Wales 2228, Australia. Mark H. Anshel is with the Department of Psychology at the University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 445 394 41
Full Text Views 7 2 0
PDF Downloads 8 2 0