Causes and Consequences of Free-Set Goals: An Investigation of Athletic Self-Regulation

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Click name to view affiliation

Thomas D. KaneSouthwest Missouri State University

Search for other papers by Thomas D. Kane in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Timothy R. BaltesSouthwest Missouri State University

Search for other papers by Timothy R. Baltes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Michael C. MossGeorge Mason University

Search for other papers by Michael C. Moss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This research examined free-set goals (FS goals) reported by wrestling camp participants. FS goals are goals as stated by those who are simply asked to report personal goals within a defined context. Because goal content is free to vary and is defined by the athletes themselves, it is argued that FS goals underlie self-regulation in sport. Preseason, season, and long-term FS goals reported by wrestlers were coded for difficulty and specificity. Predictors and outcomes drawn from goal theory research were related to FS goals set for the upcoming season. Prior performance experiences predicted FS season goals, and FS season goals predicted performance outcomes collected after the wrestling season. Unique to goal theory, FS goal specificity was as strongly related to performance as was FS goal difficulty. Findings are discussed in relation to athletes’ self-regulation.

The authors are with the Psychology Dept., Southwest Missouri State University, 901 S. National St., Springfield, MO 65804. Michael Moss was at George Mason University at the time of this study.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1857 854 1
Full Text Views 55 12 0
PDF Downloads 56 13 0