Motor Performance as a Function of Audience Affability and Metaknowledge

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Birmingham
  • | 2 University of Hong Kong
  • | 3 University of Lethbridge
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $87.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $116.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $166.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $221.00

Butler and Baumeister (1998) suggested that performance decrement of a difficult skill-based task occurring only in the presence of a supportive audience could be explained by “a cautious performance style” (p. 1226). A potential alternative explanation stems from Masters’ (1992) contention that skill failure under pressure occurs when performers attempt to control motor performance using explicit knowledge. It was proposed that a skill acquired with minimal metaknowledge (i.e., a limited explicit knowledge base) would remain robust regardless of audience type. To test this hypothesis, a table tennis shot was learned with either a greater or a lesser bank of explicit task knowledge. Performance was subsequently assessed in the presence of observation-only audiences, supportive audiences, and adversarial audiences. Consistent with hypotheses, supportive audiences induced performance decrement in the explicit-learning group only. It was argued that supportive audiences engender higher levels of internally focused attention than do adversarial or observation-only audiences, increasing the chance of disruption to skill execution when performance characteristics involve a large amount of explicit processing.

School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Univ. of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, U.K.

Institute of Human Performance, Univ. of Hong Kong, Lindsay Ride Sport Center, Pokfulam Rd., Hong Kong

Dept. of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1K 3M4.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 729 604 58
Full Text Views 24 12 0
PDF Downloads 27 9 0