Pixels vs. Paper: Comparing Online and Traditional Survey Methods in Sport Psychology

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Click name to view affiliation

Chris LonsdaleUniversity of Otago

Search for other papers by Chris Lonsdale in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ken HodgeUniversity of Otago

Search for other papers by Ken Hodge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Elaine A. RoseUniversity of Otago

Search for other papers by Elaine A. Rose in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The purpose of this study was to compare participant responses to a questionnaire delivered via the Internet with data collected using a traditional paper and pencil format distributed via postal mail. Athletes (N = 214, mean age 26.53 years) representing 18 sports from the New Zealand Academy of Sport were randomly assigned into two groups and completed the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ; Raedeke & Smith, 2001). There was a noticeable trend (p = .07, two-tailed) toward a better response rate in the online group (57.07%) compared with the postal group (46.63%). Furthermore, online questionnaires were returned faster and contained fewer missing responses. A series of nested, multigroup confirmatory factor analyses indicated that there were no significant group differences in the factor structure or latent mean structures of the ABQ.

All authors were with the School of Physical Education, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, at the time of this study. C. Lonsdale is now with the Dept. of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3354 931 32
Full Text Views 148 37 5
PDF Downloads 140 29 6