Factorial Integrity of the Sport Anxiety Scale: A Methodological Note and Revised Scoring Recommendations

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Click name to view affiliation

Ronald E. SmithUniversity of Washington

Search for other papers by Ronald E. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sean P. CummingUniversity of Washington

Search for other papers by Sean P. Cumming in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Frank L. SmollUniversity of Washington

Search for other papers by Frank L. Smoll in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Results of several recent studies have called into question the factorial integrity of the Sport Anxiety Scale (SAS; Smith, Smoll, & Schutz, 1990) because two items (14 and 20) that loaded on the Concentration Disruption subscale in our validation and cross-validation samples have loaded or cross-loaded on the Worry subscale in other samples. We agree that this is a serious problem, and we evaluate proposed modifications of the SAS on both conceptual and empirical grounds. For researchers currently using the SAS, we recommend a new scoring system that deletes two troublesome Concentration Disruption items and one Somatic Anxiety item, preserving separate and factorially consistent Somatic, Worry, and Concentration Disruption subscales. We present evidence that our original Worry scale provides a better CFA fit than a suggested “cognitive anxiety” alternative that combines the two concentration disruption items with the Worry scale items. We also describe nonreplication of the SAS three-factor structure in child samples and caution researchers against computing subscale scores for child samples.

The authors are with the Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1525.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2167 916 70
Full Text Views 83 18 0
PDF Downloads 77 21 1