Achievement Goals, Competition Appraisals, and the Psychological and Emotional Welfare of Sport Participants

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Click name to view affiliation

James W. AdieUniversity of Birmingham

Search for other papers by James W. Adie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joan L. DudaUniversity of Birmingham

Search for other papers by Joan L. Duda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nikos NtoumanisUniversity of Birmingham

Search for other papers by Nikos Ntoumanis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Grounded in the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), a model was tested examining the hypothesized relationships between approach and avoidance (mastery and performance) goals, challenge and threat appraisals of sport competition, and positive and negative indices of well-being (i.e., self-esteem, positive, and negative affect). A further aim was to determine the degree to which the cognitive appraisals mediated the relationship between the four achievement goals and the indicators of athletes’ welfare. Finally, measurement and structural invariance was tested with respect to gender in the hypothesized model. An alternative model was also estimated specifying self-esteem as an antecedent of the four goals and cognitive appraisals. Four hundred and twenty-four team sport participants (Mage = 24.25) responded to a multisection questionnaire. Structural equation modeling analyses provided support for the hypothesized model only. Challenge and threat appraisals partially mediated the relationships observed between mastery-based goals and the well-being indicators. Lastly, the hypothesized model was found to be invariant across gender.

The authors are with the School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3401 1141 229
Full Text Views 237 75 12
PDF Downloads 251 95 4