The CSGU: A Measure of Controllability, Stability, Globality, and Universality Attributions

Click name to view affiliation

Pete Coffee University of Exeter

Search for other papers by Pete Coffee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Tim Rees University of Exeter

Search for other papers by Tim Rees in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This article reports initial evidence of construct validity for a four-factor measure of attributions assessing the dimensions of controllability, stability, globality, and universality (the CSGU). In Study 1, using confirmatory factor analysis, factors were confirmed across least successful and most successful conditions. In Study 2, following less successful performances, correlations supported hypothesized relationships between subscales of the CSGU and subscales of the CDSII (McAuley, Duncan, & Russell, 1992). In Study 3, following less successful performances, moderated hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that individuals have higher subsequent self-efficacy when they perceive causes of performance as controllable, and/or specific, and/or universal. An interaction for controllability and stability demonstrated that if causes are perceived as likely to recur, it is important to perceive that causes are controllable. Researchers are encouraged to use the CSGU to examine main and interactive effects of controllability and generalizability attributions upon outcomes such as self-efficacy, emotions, and performance.

The authors are with the School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, U.K.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1937 165 19
Full Text Views 110 36 4
PDF Downloads 113 33 6