Using Cluster Analysis to Examine the Combinations of Motivation Regulations of Physical Education Students

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Click name to view affiliation

Sarah Ullrich-FrenchWashington State University

Search for other papers by Sarah Ullrich-French in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Anne CoxIllinois State University

Search for other papers by Anne Cox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

According to self-determination theory, motivation is multidimensional, with motivation regulations lying along a continuum of self-determination (Ryan & Deci, 2007). Accounting for the different types of motivation in physical activity research presents a challenge. This study used cluster analysis to identify motivation regulation profiles and examined their utility by testing profile differences in relative levels of self-determination (i.e., self-determination index), and theoretical antecedents (i.e., competence, autonomy, relatedness) and consequences (i.e., enjoyment, worry, effort, value, physical activity) of physical education motivation. Students (N = 386) in 6th- through 8th-grade physical education classes completed questionnaires of the variables listed above. Five profiles emerged, including average (n = 81), motivated (n = 82), self-determined (n = 91), low motivation (n = 73), and external (n = 59). Group difference analyses showed that students with greater levels of self-determined forms of motivation, regardless of non-self-determined motivation levels, reported the most adaptive physical education experiences.

Ullrich-French is with Educational Leadership and Counseling Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA. Cox is with Kinesiology and Recreation, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2294 742 140
Full Text Views 129 51 1
PDF Downloads 99 39 1