Empathy Inhibits Aggression in Competition: The Role of Provocation, Emotion, and Gender

Click name to view affiliation

Nicholas Stanger Leeds Beckett University

Search for other papers by Nicholas Stanger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maria Kavussanu University of Birmingham

Search for other papers by Maria Kavussanu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David McIntyre University of Birmingham

Search for other papers by David McIntyre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Christopher Ring University of Birmingham

Search for other papers by Christopher Ring in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Although the empathy–aggression relationship has been well documented, research has yet to establish whether emotions mediate and gender moderates this relationship in athletes, under conditions of low and high provocation. In this experiment, we assigned team-sport athletes to either a high (n = 40) or a low (n = 40) empathy group, and asked them to compete in a reaction-time task against a (fictitious) opponent, under conditions of low and high provocation. Empathy reduced aggression (i.e., intensity of electrical shock administered to the opponent) at low provocation in men, and at both low and high provocation in women. Guilt mediated the effect of empathy on aggression at low provocation in men; anger did not mediate any effects of empathy on aggression. Our findings indicate that the inhibitory effect of empathy on aggression and the mediating role of guilt are moderated by provocation and gender.

Nicholas Stanger is with the Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, U.K. Maria Kavussanu, David McIntyre, and Christopher Ring are with the School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.

Address author correspondence to Nicholas Stanger at n.stanger@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
  • Collapse
  • Expand