Affective Evaluations of Exercising: The Role of Automatic–Reflective Evaluation Discrepancy

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD  $84.00

1 year subscription

USD  $111.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD  $159.00

2 year subscription

USD  $208.00

Sometimes our automatic evaluations do not correspond well with those we can reflect on and articulate. We present a novel approach to the assessment of automatic and reflective affective evaluations of exercising. Based on the assumptions of the associative-propositional processes in evaluation model, we measured participants’ automatic evaluations of exercise and then shared this information with them, asked them to reflect on it and rate eventual discrepancy between their reflective evaluation and the assessment of their automatic evaluation. We found that mismatch between self-reported ideal exercise frequency and actual exercise frequency over the previous 14 weeks could be regressed on the discrepancy between a relatively negative automatic and a more positive reflective evaluation. This study illustrates the potential of a dual-process approach to the measurement of evaluative responses and suggests that mistrusting one’s negative spontaneous reaction to exercise and asserting a very positive reflective evaluation instead leads to the adoption of inflated exercise goals.

Ralf Brand and Franziska Antoniewicz are with the Dept. of Sport and Exercise Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Address author correspondence to Ralf Brand at ralf.brand@uni-potsdam.de.
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 240 240 25
Full Text Views 26 26 0
PDF Downloads 30 30 0