Kinesthetic Imagery Provides Additive Benefits to Internal Visual Imagery on Slalom Task Performance

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD  $84.00

1 year subscription

USD  $111.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD  $159.00

2 year subscription

USD  $208.00

Recent brain imaging research demonstrates that the use of internal visual imagery (IVI) or kinesthetic imagery (KIN) activates common and distinct brain areas. In this paper, we argue that combining the imagery modalities (IVI and KIN) will lead to a greater cognitive representation (with more brain areas activated), and this will cause a greater slalom-based motor performance compared with using IVI alone. To examine this assertion, we randomly allocated 56 participants to one of the three groups: IVI, IVI and KIN, or a math control group. Participants performed a slalom-based driving task in a driving simulator, with average lap time used as a measure of performance. Results revealed that the IVI and KIN group achieved significantly quicker lap times than the IVI and the control groups. The discussion includes a theoretical advancement on why the combination of imagery modalities might facilitate performance, with links made to the cognitive neuroscience literature and applied practice.

Nichola Callow, Dan Jiang, and Ross Roberts are with the Institute for the Psychology of Elite Performance, Bangor University, U.K. Martin G. Edwards is with the Institut de Recherches en Sciences Psychologiques, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.

Address author correspondence to Nichola Callow at n.callow@bangor.ac.uk.
  • Callow, N., Roberts, R., Hardy, L., Jiang, D., & Edwards, M.G. (2013). Performance improvements from imagery: Evidence that internal visual imagery is superior to external visual imagery for slalom performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 697. PubMed doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00697

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Callow, N., & Waters, A. (2005). The effect of kinesthetic imagery on the sport confidence of flat-race horse jockeys. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 443–459. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.08.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fourkas, A., Avenanti, A., Urgesi, C., & Aglioti, S. (2006). Corticospinal facilitation during first and third person imagery. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 143–151. PubMed doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0076-0

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goginsky, A.M., & Collins, D. (1996). Research design and mental practice. Journal of Sports Science, 14, 381–92. doi:10.1080/02640419608727725

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guillot, A., Collet, C., Nguyen, V.A., Malouin, F., Richards, C., & Doyon, J. (2009). Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 2157–2172. PubMed doi:10.1002/hbm.20658

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardy, L. (1997). The Coleman Roberts Griffith address: Three myths about applied consultancy work. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9, 277–294. doi:10.1080/10413209708406487

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardy, L., & Callow, N. (1999). Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, 95–112. doi:10.1123/jsep.21.2.95

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holmes, P.S., & Collins, D.J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 60–83. doi:10.1080/10413200109339004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ietswaart, M., Johnston, M., Dijkerman, H.C., Joice, S., Scott, C.L., MacWalter, R.S., & Hamilton, S.J.C. (2011). Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: Randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain, 134, 1373–1386. PubMed doi:10.1093/brain/awr077

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–201. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00034026

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14, 103–109. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jiang, D., Edwards, M.G., Mullins, P., & Callow, N., (2015). The neural substrates for the different modalities of movement imagery. Brain and Cognition, 97, 22–31. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2015.04.005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lang, P.J. (1984). Cognitions in emotion: Concept and action. In C.E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R.B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition and behavior (pp. 192–226). New York, NY: University of Cambridge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Markland, D., & Bringer, J. (2008). Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 200–221. PubMed doi:10.1123/jsep.30.2.200

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wakefield, C., Smith, D., Aidan, P.M., & Holmes, P. (2013). Functional equivalence or behavioural matching? A critical reflection on 15 years of research using the PETTLEP model of motor imagery. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 105–121. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2012.724437

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, A., & Hardy, L. (1995). Use of different imagery perspectives on the learning and performance of different motor skills. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 169–180. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02554.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, S.E., Cooley, S.J., & Cumming, J. (2013). Layered stimulus response training improves motor imagery ability and movement execution. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35, 60–71. doi:10.1123/jsep.35.1.60

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, C., Smith, D., Burden, A., & Holmes, P. (2010). Participant-generated imagery scripts produce greater EMG activity and imagery ability. European Journal of Sports Sciences, 10, 417–425. doi:10.1080/17461391003770491

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, M., Chattington, M., Marple-Horvat, D.E., & Smith, N.C. (2007). A comparison of self-focus versus attentional explanations of choking. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29, 439–456. doi:10.1123/jsep.29.4.439

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 96 96 18
Full Text Views 19 19 5
PDF Downloads 11 11 1