Comparison of Job Responsibilities of Intercollegiate Athletic Directors and Professional Sport General Managers

in Journal of Sport Management

Click name to view affiliation

Brad D. HatfieldUniversity of Maryland

Search for other papers by Brad D. Hatfield in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jerry P. WrennUniversity of Maryland

Search for other papers by Jerry P. Wrenn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Michael M. BrettingValparaiso University

Search for other papers by Michael M. Bretting in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

A problem cited by critics of preparation programs in sport management has been the lack of specialty tracks. Therefore, responses regarding the perceived importance of job responsibilities, demographic information, and educational recommendations were solicited from athletic directors (ADs) (n = 58) of NCAA Division I-A football programs and from general managers (GMs) (n = 62) within professional sport to characterize the two areas. Multivariate contrasts upon groups of items in all areas of job responsibility yielded significant differences. The GMs rated the areas of labor relations and personnel evaluations as more important, while the ADs assigned higher ratings to all other categories (i.e., marketing, financial management, administration, public relations). A discriminant function analysis upon the individual job items corroborated these differences. These findings were discussed in terms of recommendations for the education of sport administrators.

Authors are to be recognized as equal contributors.

Address all correspondence to Brad D. Hatfield, Department of Physical Education, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2411 992 21
Full Text Views 110 25 1
PDF Downloads 70 26 1