How League and Community Affect Corporate Philanthropy in Professional Sport: A Multiple Field Embeddedness Perspective

in Journal of Sport Management
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Michigan
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $85.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $114.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $162.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $216.00

A specific form of corporate social responsibility—corporate philanthropy—has received little attention in sport scholarship despite the increased formalization of this business function in practice. Specifically, few studies have explored the institutional mechanisms that influence the corporate philanthropy of professional sport teams. Given that teams receive simultaneous institutional pressures from their league and from the community in which they operate, this study examined how the presence of multiple peers from different fields affected teams in terms of determining the appropriate level of philanthropic activity. The hypotheses were tested through a longitudinal analysis of philanthropic data from team foundations in four professional leagues in the United States from 2005 to 2017. The authors found that teams were more likely to be affected by the philanthropic giving levels of league peers than local peers. Overall, this study provides a better understanding of simultaneous institutional pressures shaping the philanthropic activities of professional sport teams.

The authors are with the School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Yang (dfyang@umich.edu) is corresponding author.
  • Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility in professional sport: Internal and external factors. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 717742. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2013). Perspectives on social responsibility. In J. Salcines, K. Babiak, & G. Walters (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and corporate social responsibility (pp. 1734). New York, NY: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bertels, S., & Peloza, J. (2008). Running just to stand still? Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1), 5672. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Block, P., & Grund, T. (2014). Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks. Network Science, 2(2), 189212. PubMed ID: 25525503 doi:

  • Bowman, W. (2011). Financial capacity and sustainability of ordinary nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(1), 3751.

  • Buchholtz, A., Amason, A., & Rutherford, M. (1999). Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business & Society, 38(2), 167187. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Campbell, J. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925938. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cunningham, G.B., & Ahn, N.Y. (2019). Moderation in sport management research: Room for growth. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 23(4), 301313. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, G., & Greve, H. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 137. doi:

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147160. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fort, R., & Quirk, J. (2004). Owner objectives and competitive balance. Journal of Sports Economics, 5(1), 2032. doi:

  • Foster, W., & Washington, M. (2009). Organizational structure and home team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 15(3/4), 158171. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In P. DiMaggio & W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232262). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11(1), 281304. doi:

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3) 445471. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 454479. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Godfrey, P. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777798. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Godfrey, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in sport: An overview and key issues. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 698716. doi:

  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317371. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 2748. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greve, H. (1998). Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 967988. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gumas, J. (2018). Pro sports teams can be challenger brands, too. Retrieved from –––––––https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2018/04/25/pro–sports–teams–can–be–challenger–brands–too/#9b28cb971a32

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haunschild, P., & Miner, A. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 472500. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 12511271. doi:

  • Internal Revenue Service. (n.d). Instructions for Form 990 return of organization exempt from income tax. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inoue, Y., Kent, A., & Lee, S. (2011). CSR and the bottom line: Analyzing the link between CSR and financial performance for professional teams. Journal of Sport Management, 25(6), 531549. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kihl, L., Babiak, K., & Tainsky, S. (2014). Evaluating the implementation of a professional sport team’s corporate community involvement initiative. Journal of Sport Management, 28(3), 324337. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, H., & Pennings, J. (2009). Innovation and strategic renewal in mature markets: A study of the tennis racket industry. Organization Science, 20(2), 368383. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kolyperas, D., Anagnostopoulos, C., Chadwick, S., & Sparks, L. (2016). Applying a communicating vessels framework to CSR value co–creation: Empirical evidence from professional team sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 30(6), 702719. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 9941006. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kraatz, M., & Zajac, E. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 812836. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leary, M., & Roberts, M. (2014). Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy? The Journal of Finance, 69(1), 139178. doi:

  • Littlefield, A. (2016, April 11). The top 3 most charitable baseball teams. WeDidIt. Retrieved from https://blog.wedid.it/the-top-3-most-charitable-baseball-teams

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 2956. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marquis, C., Davis, G., & Glynn, M. (2013). Golfing alone? Corporations, elites, and nonprofit growth in 1000 American communities. Organization Science, 24(1), 3957.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marquis, C., Glynn, M., & Davis, G. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925945. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2016). Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organization Science, 27(5), 13251341. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDonald, M., & Rascher, D. (2000). Does bat day make cents? The effect of promotions on the demand for Major League Baseball. Journal of Sport Management, 14(1), 827. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340363. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M.H. (1985). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145179. doi:

  • Pinnuck, M., & Potter, B. (2006). Impact of on-field football success on the off-field financial performance of AFL football clubs. Accounting & Finance, 46(3), 499517. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raffaelli, R., & Glynn, M. (2014). Turnkey or tailored? Relational pluralism, institutional complexity, and the organizational adoption of more or less customized practices. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 541562. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, H., Greve, H., & Davis, G. (2001). Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 502526. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ratten, V., & Babiak, K. (2010). The role of social responsibility, philanthropy and entrepreneurship in the sport industry. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(4), 482487. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robinson, R. (2005). Sports philanthropy: An analysis of the charitable foundations of major league teams (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rowan, B. (1982). Organizational structure and the institutional environment: The case of public schools. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(2), 259279. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rowe, K., Karg, A., & Sherry, E. (2019). Community–oriented practice: Examining CSR and development activities in professional sport. Sport Management Review, 22(3), 363378. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott, R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Sheth, H., & Babiak, K. (2010). Beyond the game: Perceptions and practices of CSR in the professional sport industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 433450. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1994). Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organization Studies, 15(6), 803827. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sparvero, E., & Kent, A. (2014). Sport team nonprofit organizations. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 6(4), 98116.

  • Stendardi, E. Jr. (1992). Corporate philanthropy: The redefinition of enlightened self-interest. The Social Science Journal, 29(1), 2130. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stewart, B., & Smith, A. (1999). The special features of sport. Annals of Leisure Research, 2(1), 8799. doi:

  • Tilcsik, A., & Marquis, C. (2013). Punctuated generosity: How mega–events and natural disasters affect corporate philanthropy in US communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 111148. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (2010). 2010 Census Summary File 1. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/sf1.pdf#page=619

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walters, G., & Tacon, R. (2013). Stakeholder engagement in European football. In J. Paramio-Salcines, K. Babiak, & G. Walters (Eds.), Handbook of sport and corporate social responsibility (pp. 236248). London, UK: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walzel, S., Robertson, J., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2018). CSR in professional team sports organizations: An integrative review. Journal of Sport Management, 32(6), 511530. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Washington, M., & Ventresca, M. (2008). Institutional contradictions and struggles in the formation of U.S. collegiate basketball, 1880–1938. Journal of Sport Management, 22(1), 3049. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wooldridge, J. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 683 683 54
Full Text Views 84 84 4
PDF Downloads 29 29 2