Comparisons of Land-Based and Aquatic-Based Plyometric Programs during an 8-Week Training Period

in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $74.00

1 year subscription

USD $99.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $141.00

2 year subscription

USD $185.00

Context:

Land and aquatic plyometrics have clinical relevance for exercise, sport performance, and rehabilitation, yet study is limited comparing both.

Objective:

To compare the effects of land-based and aquatic-based plyometric-training programs on performance variables, muscle soreness, and range of motion (ROM).

Setting:

Aquatic facility and biomechanics laboratory.

Subjects:

Forty subjects randomly assigned to 3 groups: land (n = 13), water (n = 13), and control (n = 14).

Main Outcome Measures:

Performance variables, muscle soreness, and ROM were measured before and after an 8-week training period. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and a Bonferroni post hoc test determined significance.

Results:

ANCOVA revealed significant differences between groups with respect to plantar-flexion ROM (P < .05). Paired t test determined that the aquatic group significantly increased muscle power pretest to posttest (P < .05).

Conclusions:

Results indicate that aquatic plyometric training can be an alternative approach to enhancing performance.

Miller is with the Graduate Athletic Training Program, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008. Berry is with the Athletic Training Program, Salem State College, Salem, MA 01970. Bullard and Gilders are with the School of Recreation and Sport Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701.

Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Article Sections
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 119 119 29
Full Text Views 7 7 1
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar