Clinical Assessment of Ankle Injury Outcomes: Case Scenario Using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure

in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Click name to view affiliation

Nicole L. Cosby
Search for other papers by Nicole L. Cosby in
Current site
Google Scholar
Jay Hertel
Search for other papers by Jay Hertel in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access

Patient Scenario:

A 20-y-old male Division 1 college basketball player sustained a grade 2 inversion ankle sprain during preseason that is preventing him from practicing and competing.

Clinical Outcomes Assessment:

The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) was administered to the injured athlete as an evaluative tool to provide the clinician with valuable subjective information on the patient’s self-reported function. The FAAM consists of 2 subscales: the activities of daily living (ADL) subscale and the sports subscale. Together the 2 subscales contain 29 questions (21 questions on the ADL and 8 on the sports subscale), which assess self-reported function and disability in the foot and ankle.

Clinical Decision Making:

The addition of the self-reported functional measures provides the clinician with more quantitative data to make clinical decisions than is possible with typical clinical exams. Self-reported functional assessments should not replace thorough clinical examination or sound clinical judgment; instead they should be an adjunct to them.

Clinical Bottom Line:

In addition to our objective assessment tools, the FAAM provides clinicians with a tool that can be used to assess function and disability through our patients’ self-reported responses. When used for evaluative purposes the FAAM can measure an individual’s changes in function and disability over time.

The authors are with the Exercise and Sport Injury Laboratory, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1863 935 9
Full Text Views 38 5 1
PDF Downloads 44 6 0