Shoulder-Muscle Activation in Individuals With Previous Shoulder Injuries

in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Click name to view affiliation

Alyssa Muething
Search for other papers by Alyssa Muething in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Shellie Acocello
Search for other papers by Shellie Acocello in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kimberly A. Pritchard
Search for other papers by Kimberly A. Pritchard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stephen F. Brockmeier
Search for other papers by Stephen F. Brockmeier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Susan A. Saliba
Search for other papers by Susan A. Saliba in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Joseph M. Hart
Search for other papers by Joseph M. Hart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Context:

Understanding how muscles activate in a population with a previous glenohumeral-joint (GH) injury may help clinicians understand how to build a conservative treatment plan to strengthen or activate the specific muscles in an attempt to reduce recurrent shoulder injury and development of GH laxity.

Objective:

To investigate muscle-activation differences between the previously injured limb of individuals with a history of GH-joint injury and healthy matched controls during functional isometric contractions.

Design:

Case control.

Setting:

University research laboratory.

Participants:

17 individuals (8 women, 9 men; age 22.3 ± 2.6 y, height 172.4 ± 8.8 cm, mass 75.4 ± 16.5 kg) with previous unilateral shoulder pain and 17 (8 women, 9 men; age 22.9 ± 3.9 y, height 170.9 ± 11.3 cm, mass 73.6 ± 22.9 kg) with no history of shoulder pain or injury.

Intervention(s):

Diagnostic ultrasound measurements of the supraspinatus were completed in both resting and contracted states to assess changes in muscle thickness. Manual muscle tests (anterior deltoid, upper trapezius, infraspinatus, lower trapezius, serratus anterior) and functional isometric contractions (forward flexion, scaption, abduction) were measured using electromyography.

Main Outcome Measures:

Peak, normalized activation of each muscle and supraspinatus thickness activation ratio were compared between groups and bilaterally within groups using separate ANOVAs.

Results:

The anterior deltoid was significantly less activated during all functional isometric tasks in previously injured subjects than in healthy subjects (P = .024). In previously injured subjects, the involved limb-lower trapezius was significantly less activated during scaption and abduction tasks than the contralateral side (P = .022 and P = .031, respectively).

Conclusions:

There were decreases in muscle activation in the anterior deltoid between previously injured and healthy people, as well as in the lower trapezius, in previously injured subjects. Understanding the source of muscle-activation deficits can help clinicians focus rehabilitation exercises on specific muscles.

Muething, Saliba, and Hart are with the Dept of Kinesiology, and Brockmeier, the Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. Acocello is with the Dept of Health & Human Performance, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN. Pritchard is with the Div of Athletic Training, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA.

Address author correspondence to Shellie Acocello at Shellie-Acocello@utc.edu.
  • Collapse
  • Expand