Comparison of Hip- and Back-Muscle Activity and Pelvic Compensation in Healthy Subjects During 3 Different Prone Table Hip-Extension Exercises

in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Click name to view affiliation

In-cheol Jeon
Search for other papers by In-cheol Jeon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Oh-yun Kwon
Search for other papers by Oh-yun Kwon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jong-hyuck Weon
Search for other papers by Jong-hyuck Weon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ui-jae Hwang
Search for other papers by Ui-jae Hwang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sung-hoon Jung
Search for other papers by Sung-hoon Jung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Context:

Prone hip extension has been recommended for strengthening the back and hip muscles. Previous studies have investigated prone hip extension conducted with subjects on the floor in the prone position. However, no study has compared 3 different table hip-extension (THE) positions in terms of the activities of the back- and hip-joint muscles with lumbopelvic motion.

Objective:

To identify more effective exercises for strengthening the gluteus maximus (GM) by comparing 3 different exercises (THE alone, THE with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver [THEA], and THEA with chair support under the knee [THEAC]) based on electromyographic muscle activity and pelvic compensation.

Design:

Repeated-measure within-subject intervention.

Setting:

University research laboratory.

Participants:

16 healthy men.

Main Outcome Measures:

Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to obtain data on the GM, erector spinae (ES), multifidus, biceps femoris (BF), and semitendinosus (ST). Pelvic compensation was monitored using an electromagnetic motion-tracking device. Exertion during each exercise was recorded. Any significant difference in electromyographic muscle activity and pelvic motion among the 3 conditions (THE vs THEA vs THEAC) was assessed using a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc test.

Results:

The muscle activities recorded by EMG differed significantly among the 3 exercises (P < .01). GM activity was increased significantly during THEAC (P < .01). There was a significant difference in lumbopelvic kinematics in terms of anterior tilting (F = 19.49, P < .01) and rotation (F= 27.38, P < .01) among the 3 exercises.

Conclusions:

The THEAC exercise was the most effective for strengthening the GM without overactivity of the ES, BF, and ST muscles and lumbopelvic compensation compared with THE and THEA.

Jeon is with the Dept of Physical Therapy, Hoseo University, Chungnam, South Korea. Kwon, Hwang, and Jung are with the Dept of Physical Therapy, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea. Weon is with the Dept of Physical Therapy, Joongbu University, Geumsan, South Korea.

Kwon (kwonoy@yonsei.ac.kr) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand