Changes in Hamstring Range of Motion After Neurodynamic Sciatic Sliders: A Critically Appraised Topic

Click name to view affiliation

Robert J. Bonser
Search for other papers by Robert J. Bonser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christy L. Hancock
Search for other papers by Christy L. Hancock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bethany L. Hansberger
Search for other papers by Bethany L. Hansberger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rick A. Loutsch
Search for other papers by Rick A. Loutsch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eric K. Stanford
Search for other papers by Eric K. Stanford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alli K. Zeigel
Search for other papers by Alli K. Zeigel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Russell T. Baker
Search for other papers by Russell T. Baker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James May
Search for other papers by James May in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alan Nasypany
Search for other papers by Alan Nasypany in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Scott Cheatham
Search for other papers by Scott Cheatham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Clinical Scenario:

Hamstring tightness is a common condition leading to dysfunctional or restricted movement that is often treated with stretching. Neurodynamics has been proposed as an alternative to stretching by targeting the neural system rather than muscle tissue.

Focused Clinical Question:

In an active population, what is the effect of using neurodynamic sliders compared with stretching on traditional measures of range of motion (ROM)?

Summary of Key Findings:

The authors of a well-designed study found that neurodynamic sliders were more effective than static stretching, while the authors of 2 less-well-designed studies reported no difference with static stretching or that proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching was more effective than neurodynamic sliders.

Clinical Bottom Line:

Evidence exists to support the use of neurodynamic sliders to increase measures of hamstring ROM in patients who present with limited hamstring flexibility; however, the effectiveness of neurodynamic sliders compared with traditional stretching is inconclusive.

Strength of Recommendation:

Grade B evidence exists that neurodynamic sliders perform as well as traditional stretching techniques at increasing measures of hamstring ROM in patients with limited hamstring flexibility.

Bonser is with the Dept of Biology–Athletic Training, Waynesburg University, Waynesburg, PA. Hancock is with the Dept of Kinesiology, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA. Hansberger, Stanford, Zeigel, and Nasypany are with the Dept of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. Baker is with the Dept of Movement Sciences, and May, the Athletic Training Program, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. Loutsch is with the Dept of Kinesiology, Northwestern College, Orange City, IA. Cheatham is with the Dept of Kinesiology and Recreation, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA.

Bonser (bons7989@vandals.uidaho.edu) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand