Effect of Loading Devices on Muscle Activation in Squat and Lunge

Click name to view affiliation

Hong-Wen Wu
Search for other papers by Hong-Wen Wu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Cheng-Feng Tsai
Search for other papers by Cheng-Feng Tsai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kai-Han Liang
Search for other papers by Kai-Han Liang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Yi-Wen Chang
Search for other papers by Yi-Wen Chang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Context: Squats and lunges are common exercises frequently applied in muscle-strengthening and therapeutic exercises. The loading devices are often used to increase the training intensity. Objective: To determine the effect of loading devices on muscle activation in squat and lunge and to compare the differences in muscle activation between squat and lunge. Design: Cross-sectional cohort. Participants: Nineteen healthy, male, recreationally active individuals without a history of lower limb injury. Interventions: Each participant performed 10 repetitions of a squat under 5 conditions: unloaded, barbell, dumbbell, loaded vest, and kettlebell, and 10 repetitions of a lunge under 4 conditions: unloaded, barbell, dumbbell, and loaded vest. Main Outcome Measures: The electromyography signals of quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius lateralis and medialis were measured. One-way repeated-measure analysis of variance was used to compare the difference among different loading conditions. Paired t test was used to compare the difference between squat and lunge. Results: The muscle activation in the loaded conditions was significantly higher than that in nonloaded conditions in squat and lunge. Compared with the barbell, dumbbell, and loaded vest conditions, the semitendinosus showed significantly higher activation, and the tibialis anterior showed significantly lower activation in kettlebell condition in squat. No significant difference in muscle activation was found among barbell, dumbbell, and kettlebell conditions in lunge. In addition, quadriceps and hamstring activities were significantly higher in lunge than in squat. Conclusions: Muscle activation was affected by the loading devices in squat but not affected in lunge. Kettlebell squat could be suggested for targeting in strengthening medial hamstring. Progressive strengthening exercise could be recommended from squat to lunge based on sequential activation level.

Wu is with the Department of Physical Education, National Taiwan University of Sport, Taichung, Taiwan. Tsai and Chang are with the Department of Exercise Health Science, National Taiwan University of Sport, Taichung, Taiwan. Liang is with the Department of Bio-Industrial Mechatronics Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Chang (changyw@ntupes.edu.tw) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Fagan V, Delahunt E. Patellofemoral pain syndrome—a review on the associated neuromuscular deficits and current treatment options. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:789795. PubMed ID: 18424487 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.046623

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, et al. Effects of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(9):15521566. PubMed ID: 11528346 doi:10.1097/00005768-200109000-00020

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Jalali M, Farahmand F, Rezaeian T, Ramsey DK, Mousavi SME. Electromyographic analysis of anterior cruciate deficient knees with and without functional bracing during lunge exercise. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40(2):270276. PubMed ID: 25519297 doi:10.1177/0309364614560940

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Escamilla RF, Zheng N, Macleod TD, et al. Cruciate ligament forces between short-step and long-step forward lunge. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(10):19321942. PubMed ID: 20195182 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d966d4

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Singh B, Yack HJ, Francis SL, Janz KF. Biomechanical loads during common rehabilitation exercises in obese individuals. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(2):189196. PubMed ID: 25883867

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Ayotte NW, Stetts DM, Keenan G, Greenway EH. Electromyographical analysis of selected lower extremity muscles during 5 unilateral weight-bearing exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(2):4855. PubMed ID: 17366959 doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2354

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    McCurdy K, O’Kelley E, Kutz M, Langford G, Ernest J, Torres M. Comparison of lower extremity EMG between the 2-leg squat and modified single-leg squat in female athletes. J Sport Rehabil. 2010;19(1):5770. PubMed ID: 20231745 doi:10.1123/jsr.19.1.57

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Caterisano A, Moss RE, Pellinger TK, et al. The effect of back squat depth on the EMG activity of 4 superficial hip and thigh muscles. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(3):428432. PubMed ID: 12173958

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Saeterbakken AH, Fimland MS. Muscle force output and electromyographic activity in squats with various unstable surfaces. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(1):130136. PubMed ID: 22450254 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182541d43

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Lee D, Lee S, Park J. Impact of decline-board squat exercises and knee joint angles on the muscle activity of the lower limbs. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(8):26172619. PubMed ID: 26357447 doi:10.1589/jpts.27.2617

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Macrum E, Bell DR, Boling M, Lewek M, Padua D. Effect of limiting ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion on lower extremity kinematics and muscle-activation patterns during a squat. J Sport Rehabil. 2012;21(2):144150. PubMed ID: 22100617 doi:10.1123/jsr.21.2.144

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Paoli A, Marcolin G, Petrone N. The effect of stance width on the electromyographical activity of eight superficial thigh muscles during back squat with different bar loads. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):246250. PubMed ID: 19130646 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181876811

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Bouillon LE, Wilhelm J, Eisel P, Wiesner J, Rachow M, Hatteberg L. Electromyographic assessment of muscle activity between genders during unilateral weight-bearing tasks using adjusted distances. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(6):595605. PubMed ID: 23316423

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Farrokhi S, Pollard CD, Souza RB, Chen Y-J, Reischl S, Powers CM. Trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(7):403409. PubMed ID: 18591759 doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2634

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Criswell E. Cram’s Introduction to Surface Electromyography. 2nd ed. Sunbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2011.

  • 16.

    Gullett JC, Tillman MD, Gutierrez GM, Chow JW. A biomechanical comparison of back and front squats in healthy trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):284292. PubMed ID: 19002072 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818546bb

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Selkowitz DM, Beneck GJ, Powers CM. Which exercises target the gluteal muscles while minimizing activation of the tensor fascia lata? Electromyographic assessment using fine-wire electrodes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(2):5464. PubMed ID: 23160432 doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.4116

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    French HP, Dunleavy M, Cusack T. Activation levels of gluteus medius during therapeutic exercise as measured with electromyography: a structured review. Phys Ther Rev. 2010;15(2):92105. doi:10.1179/174328810X12719009060380

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Schwanbeck S, Chilibeck PD, Binsted G. A comparison of free weight squat to Smith machine squat using electromyography. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(9):25882591. PubMed ID: 19855308 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1b181

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Aspe RR, Swinton PA. Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(10):28272836. PubMed ID: 24662228 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000462

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Contreras B, Vigotsky AD, Schoenfeld BJ, Beardsley C, Cronin J. A comparison of gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis electromyography amplitude in the parallel, full, and front squat variations in resistance-trained females. J Appl Biomech. 2016;32(1):1622. PubMed ID: 26252837 doi:10.1123/jab.2015-0113

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Zebis MK, Skotte J, Andersen CH, et al. Kettlebell swing targets semitendinosus and supine leg curl targets biceps femoris: an EMG study with rehabilitation implications. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(18):11921198. PubMed ID: 22736206 doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090281

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Begalle RL, DiStefano LJ, Blackburn T, Padua DA. Quadriceps and hamstrings coactivation during common therapeutic exercises. J Athl Train. 2012;47(4):396405. PubMed ID: 22889655 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.01

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Tsaklis P, Malliaropoulos N, Mendiguchia J, et al. Muscle and intensity based hamstring exercise classification in elite female track and field athletes: implications for exercise selection during rehabilitation. Open Access J Sports Med. 2015;6:209217. PubMed ID: 26170726

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Andersen CH, Aagaard P, Andersen LL. Muscle activity during leg strengthening exercise using free weights and elastic resistance: effects of ballistic vs controlled contractions. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32(1):6578. PubMed ID: 23231756 doi:10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.002

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Stastny P, Lehnert M, Zaatar AM, Svoboda Z, Xaverova Z. Does the dumbbell-carrying position change the muscle activity in split squats and walking lunges? J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(11):31773187. PubMed ID: 25968228 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000976

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Boudreau SN, Dwyer MK, Mattacola CG, Lattermann C, Uhl TL, McKeon JM. Hip-muscle activation during the lunge, single-leg squat, and step-up-and-over exercises. J Sport Rehabil. 2009;18(1):91103. PubMed ID: 19321909 doi:10.1123/jsr.18.1.91

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 6369 2124 189
Full Text Views 142 46 8
PDF Downloads 120 36 5