Russian and Low-Frequency Currents Induced Similar Neuromuscular Adaptations in Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Click name to view affiliation
Search for other papers by Karenina Arrais Guida Modesto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pedro Ferreira Alves de Oliveira in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hellora Gonçalves Fonseca in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus Porto Azevedo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vinicius Guzzoni in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martim Bottaro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicolas Babault in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joao Luiz Quagliotti Durigan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Context: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is widely used to induce muscular strength increase; however, no study has compared Russian current (RC) with pulsed current (PC) effects after a training program. Objectives: We studied the effects of different neuromuscular electrical stimulation currents, RC, and PC on the neuromuscular system after a 6-week training period. Design: Blinded randomized controlled trial. Setting: Laboratory. Patients: A total of 27 male soccer players (age 22.2 [2.2] y, body mass 74.2 [10.0] kg, height 177 [0] cm, and body mass index 23.7 [2.9] kg/cm2 for the control group; 22.1 [3.1] y, 69.7 [5.7] kg, 174 [0] cm, and 23.0 [2.5] kg/cm for the PC group; and 23.0 [3.4] y, 72.1 [10.7] kg, 175 [0] cm, and 23.5 [3.4] kg/cm for the RC group) were randomized into 3 groups: (1) control group; (2) RC (2500 Hz, burst 100 Hz, and phase duration 200 μs); and (3) PC (100 Hz and 200 μs). Intervention: The experimental groups trained for 6 weeks, with 3 sessions per week with neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Main Outcome Measures: Maximal voluntary isometric contraction and evoked torque, muscle architecture, sensory discomfort (visual analog scale), and electromyographic activity were evaluated before and after the 6-week period. Results: Evoked torque increased in the RC (169.5% [78.2%], P < .01) and PC (248.7% [81.1%], P < .01) groups. Muscle thickness and pennation angle increased in the RC (8.7% [3.8%] and 16.7% [9.0%], P < .01) and PC (16.1% [8.0%] and 27.4% [11.0%], P < .01) groups. The PC demonstrated lower values for visual analog scale (38.8% [17.1%], P < .01). There was no significant time difference for maximal voluntary isometric contraction and root mean square values (P > .05). For all these variables, there was no difference between the RC and PC (P > .05). Conclusion: Despite the widespread use of RC in clinical practice, RC and PC training programs produced similar neuromuscular adaptations in soccer players. Nonetheless, as PC generated less perceived discomfort, it could be preferred after several training sessions.
Modesto is with the Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. de Oliveira and Bottaro are with Physical Education Department, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. Fonseca and Azevedo are with Physiotherapy Division, University of Brasília, Brazil. Guzzoni is with Federal University of Paraíba, Brasília, Brazil. Babault is with INSERM UMR1093-CAPS, UFR des Sciences du Sport, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France; and the Centre d’Expertise de la Performance, UFR des Sciences du Sport, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France. Durigan is with the Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil. Modesto is also with the College of Ceilândia, University of Brasília, Brazil.
© 2023 Human Kinetics