Muscle Activation in the Shoulder Girdle and Lumbopelvic-Hip Complex During Common Therapeutic Exercises

in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Click name to view affiliation

Luk Devorski
Search for other papers by Luk Devorski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David M. Bazett-Jones
Search for other papers by David M. Bazett-Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Colby Mangum
Search for other papers by L. Colby Mangum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Neal R. Glaviano
Search for other papers by Neal R. Glaviano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Context: Lumbopelvic-hip complex (LPHC) exercises are used to increase stabilization within the human body. Torso-elevated side support (TESS), foot-elevated side support (FESS), prone bridge plank (PBP), and V-sit are common LPHC exercises. Objective: To evaluate muscle activation in the shoulder girdle and LPHC during 4 LPHC exercises and evaluate the reasoning for termination. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Seventeen healthy participants (12 males and 5 females; age: 21.47 [3.16] y, height: 179.73 [8.92] cm, mass: 76.89 [11.17] kg). Main Outcome Measures: Participants completed 2 repetitions of the TESS, FESS, PBP, and V-sit until failure. Surface electromyography of the middle deltoid, latissimus dorsi, middle trapezius, rectus abdominis, erector spinae, external oblique, and gluteus medius were recorded and normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). The duration of exercise and subjective reasoning for termination of exercise was completed following the 4 tasks. Results: The TESS and PBP had significantly greater middle deltoid muscle activation (TESS: 55.66% [24.45%] MVIC and PBP: 42.63% [18.25%] MVIC) compared with the FESS (10.10% [10.04%] MVIC) and V-sit (2.21% [1.94%] MVIC), P < .05. The TESS produced significantly greater external oblique activity (78.13% [32.32%] MVIC) than the PBP (54.99% [19.54%] MVIC), P < .05. Due to shoulder fatigue and pain, 41.1% and 17.0% of participants terminated the TESS, respectively. The PBP was terminated due to abdominal fatigue (41.1%) and upper-extremity fatigue (47.0%). Conclusions: The V-sit resulted in isolated activity of the abdominal portion of the LPHC. The FESS had increased global co-contraction of the LPHC compared with the TESS. The PBP and TESS had significant muscle activation in the upper-extremity.

Devorski, Bazett-Jones, and Glaviano are with the School of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA. Devorski is now with the University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Mangum is with the College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Glaviano is now with the University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. Bazett-Jones is also with Motion Analysis and Integrative Neurophysiology Lab, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.

Devorski (luk.devorski@ucf.edu) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Youdas JW, Boor MM, Darfler AL, Koenig MK, Mills KM, Hollman JH. Surface electromyographic analysis of core trunk and hip muscles during selected rehabilitation exercises in the side-bridge to neutral spine position. Sports Health. 2014;6(5):416421. PubMed ID: 25177418 doi:10.1177/1941738114539266

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Durall CJ, Greene PF, Kernozek TW. A comparison of two isometric tests of trunk flexor endurance. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(7):19391944. PubMed ID: 22728944 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318237ea1c

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(8):941944. PubMed ID: 10453772 doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90087-4

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Ireland ML, Willson JD, Ballantyne BT, Davis IM. Hip strength in females with and without patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):671676. PubMed ID: 14669962 doi:10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.671

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Fredericson M, Cookingham CL, Chaudhari AM, Dowdell BC, Oestreicher N, Sahrmann SA. Hip abductor weakness in distance runners with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10(3):169175. PubMed ID: 10959926 doi:10.1097/00042752-200007000-00004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Zazulak BT, Hewett TE, Reeves NP, Goldberg B, Cholewicki J. Deficits in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk: prospective biomechanical-epidemiologic study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):11231130. PubMed ID: 17468378 doi:10.1177/0363546507301585

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Arokoski JP, Valta T, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpää M. Back and abdominal muscle function during stabilization exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):10891098. PubMed ID: 11494189 doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.23819

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Taimela S, Härkäpää K. Strength, mobility, their changes, and pain reduction in active functional restoration for chronic low back disorders. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9(4):306312. PubMed ID: 8877957 doi:10.1097/00002517-199608000-00006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Reiman MP, Krier AD, Nelson JA, Rogers MA, Stuke ZO, Smith BS. Reliability of alternative trunk endurance testing procedures using clinician stabilization vs. traditional methods. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(3):730736. PubMed ID: 20145574 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c06c56

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Snarr RL, Esco MR. Electromyographical comparison of plank variations performed with and without instability devices. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(11):32983305. PubMed ID: 25264667 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000521

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Peterson D. Proposed performance standards for the plank for inclusion consideration into the navy’s physical readiness test. Strength Cond J. 2013;35(5):2226. doi:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000003

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Greene PF, Durall CJ, Kernozek TW. Intersession reliability and concurrent validity of isometric endurance tests for the lateral trunk muscles. J Sport Rehabil. 2012;21(2):161166. PubMed ID: 22100411 doi:10.1123/jsr.21.2.161

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC. Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(12):754762. PubMed ID: 18560185 doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2471

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Lee J, Jeong K, Lee H, et al. Comparison of three different surface plank exercises on core muscle activity. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2016;5(1):2933. doi:10.14474/ptrs.2016.5.1.29

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175191. PubMed ID: 17695343 doi:10.3758/BF03193146

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Zambarano EK, Bouillon L, Glaviano NR. Relationship between lumbopelvic-hip complex stability, muscle activity, and 2-dimensional kinematics of the trunk and lower extremity. Phys Ther Sport. 2021;47:714. PubMed ID: 33099093 doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.10.003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop. 1985;(198):4349.

  • 18.

    Haines M, Murray AM, Glaviano NR, Gokeler A, Norte GE. Restricting ankle dorsiflexion does not mitigate the benefits of external focus of attention on landing biomechanics in healthy females. Hum Mov Sci. 2020;74:102719. PubMed ID: 33232855 doi:10.1016/j.humov.2020.102719

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Briggs KK, Steadman JR, Hay CJ, Hines SL. Lysholm score and Tegner activity level in individuals with normal knees. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):898901. PubMed ID: 19307332 doi:10.1177/0363546508330149

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4(1):11. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-4-11

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):361374. PubMed ID: 11018445 doi:10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Page I, Descarreaux M. Trunk muscle fatigue during a lateral isometric hold test: what are we evaluating? Chiropr Man Ther. 2012;20(1):12. doi:10.1186/2045-709x-20-12

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Imai A, Kaneoka K, Okubo Y, et al. Trunk muscle activity during lumbar stabilization exercises on both a stable and unstable surface. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(6):369375. PubMed ID: 20511695 doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3211

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Conable KM. Intraexaminer comparison of applied kinesiology manual muscle testing of varying durations: a pilot study. J Chiropr Med. 2010;9(1):310. PubMed ID: 21572637 doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2009.12.005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Kendall F, McCreary E, Provance P, Rodgers M, Romani W. Muscles: Testing and Function With Posture and Pain. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Youdas JW, Coleman KC, Holstad EE, Long SD, Veldkamp NL, Hollman JH. Magnitudes of muscle activation of spine stabilizers in healthy adults during prone on elbow planking exercises with and without a fitness ball. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34(3):212222. PubMed ID: 28922049 doi:10.1080/09593985.2017.1377792

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Escamilla RF, Lewis C, Bell D, et al. Core muscle activation during Swiss ball and traditional abdominal exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(5):265276. PubMed ID: 20436242 doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3073

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    DiGiovine NM, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J. An electromyographic analysis of the upper extremity in pitching. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992;1(1):1525. PubMed ID: 22958966 doi:10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80011-6

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    McGough JJ, Faraone SV. Estimating the size of treatment effects: moving beyond P values. Psychiatry Edgmont. 2009;6(10):2129. PubMed ID: 20011465

  • 30.

    Bohannon RW, Steffl M, Glenney SS, et al. The prone bridge test: performance, validity, and reliability among older and younger adults. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(2):385389. PubMed ID: 29861239 doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.07.005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Besomi M, Hodges PW, Van Dieën J, et al. Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: electrode selection matrix. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019;48:128144. PubMed ID: 31352156 doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4139 2823 50
Full Text Views 228 133 10
PDF Downloads 94 44 0