Reactive Strength as a Metric for Informing Return-to-Sport Decisions: A Case-Control Study
in Journal of Sport RehabilitationClick name to view affiliation
Search for other papers by Jorg Teichmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kim Hébert-Losier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel Tan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Han Wei Lem in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shabana Khanum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ananthi Subramaniam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wee-Kian Yeo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dietmar Schmidtbleicher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christopher M. Beaven in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective: Current return-to-sport decisions are primarily based on elapsed time since surgery or injury and strength measures. Given data that show rates of successful return to competitive sport at around 55%, there is strong rationale for adopting tools that will better inform return to sport decisions. The authors’ objective was to assess reactive strength as a metric for informing return-to-sport decisions. Design: Case-control design. Methods: Fifteen elite athletes from national sports teams (23 [6.0] y) in the final phase of their return-to-sport protocol following a unilateral knee injury and 16 age-matched control athletes (22 [4.6] y) performed a unilateral isometric strength test and 24-cm drop jump test. Pairwise comparisons were used to determine differences between legs within groups and differences in interleg asymmetry between groups. Results: Strength measures did not distinguish the control from the rehabilitation group; however, clear differences in the degree of asymmetry were apparent between the control and rehabilitation groups for contact time (Cohen d = 0.56; −0.14 to 1.27; 8.2%; P = .113), flight time (d = 1.10; 0.44 to 1.76; 16.0%; P = .002), and reactive strength index (d = 1.27; 0.50 to 2.04; 22.4%; P = .002). Conclusion: Reactive strength data provide insight into functional deficits that persist into the final phase of a return-to-sport protocol. The authors’ findings support the use of dynamic assessment tools to inform return-to-sport decisions to limit potential for reinjury.
Teichmann, Tan, Lem, Khanum, Subramaniam, and Yeo are with the Sports Medicine Division, National Sports Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Hébert-Losier and Beaven are with the Division of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Tauranga, New Zealand. Schmidtbleicher is with the Department of Sport Science, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
© 2023 Human Kinetics