Test–Retest Reliability of the Standing Heel-Rise Test

in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Click name to view affiliation

Michael D. Ross
Search for other papers by Michael D. Ross in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Elizabeth G. Fontenot
Search for other papers by Elizabeth G. Fontenot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Context:

The standing heel-rise test has been recommended as a means of assessing calf-muscle performance. To the authors' knowledge, the reliability of the test using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) has not been reported.

Objective:

To determine the test-retest reliability of the standing heel-rise test.

Design:

Single-group repeated measures.

Participants:

Seventeen healthy subjects.

Settings and Infevention:

Each subject was asked to perform as many standing heel raises as possible during 2 testing sessions separated by 7 days.

Main Outcome Measures:

Reliability data for the standing heel-rise test were studied through a repeated-measures analysis of variance, ICC2, 1 and SEMs.

Results:

The ICC2,1 and SEM values for the standing heel-rise test were .96 and 2.07 repetitions, respectively.

Conclusions:

The standing heel-rise test offers clinicians a reliable assessment of calfmuscle performance. Further study is necessary to determine the ability of the standing heel-rise test to detect functional deficiencies in patients recovering from lower leg injury or surgery

Michael D. Ross is an instructor, and Elizabeth G. Fontenot a student, in the Department of Biology, United States Air Force Academy, CO 80840-6226. Note: The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Department of Defense, the United States Air Force, or other federal agencies.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2353 1106 31
Full Text Views 66 20 5
PDF Downloads 61 23 5