The Effects of Practice Progressions on Learning Two Volleyball Skills

in Journal of Teaching in Physical Education

Click name to view affiliation

Karen E. French
Search for other papers by Karen E. French in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Judith E. Rink
Search for other papers by Judith E. Rink in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Linda Rikard
Search for other papers by Linda Rikard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Amys Mays
Search for other papers by Amys Mays in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Susan Lynn
Search for other papers by Susan Lynn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Peter Werner
Search for other papers by Peter Werner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The purpose was to compare the effectiveness of practice progressions on learning the volleyball serve and overhead set. Ninth-grade students were randomly assigned to three groups. Each group practiced the volleyball serve and set for 60 trials over 6 days. The progression group practiced four levels of difficulty of the set and serve. The criterion group began practice at the beginning level of difficulty and had to achieve an 80% success rate before practicing at a more advanced level. The third group practiced the AAHPERD volleyball skill tests for the serve and set for all 60 trials. At the end of practice, all subjects were posttested using these AAHPERD tests. The results indicated the progression and criterion groups had higher posttest scores than the third group. Profiles of the success rates across acquisition for each group showed that students in the third group and low-skilled students in the progression and criterion groups did not improve during practice. Students with some initial skill in the progression and criterion groups exhibited high success rates for acquisition and improvement. These results indicate that sequencing practice in progressive levels of difficulty enhances retention when task difficulty is appropriate for the learner. However, no condition was effective when task difficulty was inappropriate for the learner.

K.E. French, J.E. Rink, and P. Werner are with the Dept. of P.E., U. of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. L. Rikard is with the Dept. of P.E., East Carolina U., Greenville, NC 27834. A. Mays is with the Dept. of P.E., Columbia Coll., Columbia, SC 29203. S. Lynn is with the Dept. of P.E., Florida State U., Tallahassee, FL 32306.

  • Collapse
  • Expand