Attentional Focus and Feedback Frequency Among First Graders in Physical Education

in Journal of Teaching in Physical Education
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $63.00

1 year subscription

USD $84.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $119.00

2 year subscription

USD $156.00

Purpose: External attentional focused instructions and feedback have shown to enhance motor performance among adults, adolescents, and older children. This study examined type and frequency of instructions and feedback among younger children performing an overhand throw. Method: First graders (N = 65) were provided external or internal focused instructions at high- or low-frequency rates resulting in four experimental groups (External-High, External-Low, Internal-High, and Internal-Low). Results: Internal focused groups performed significantly better than external focused groups during retention–transfer, and children who received feedback that is more frequent performed better. External-Low performed better than External-High at the end of acquisition and retention–transfer, whereas Internal-High performed better than Internal-Low throughout acquisition. Conclusion: Data support previous research indicating children need more feedback when learning a motor skill but did not support prior studies regarding attentional focus. More work is needed to understand how and why young children respond differently to attentional focused instructions and feedback.

Petranek and Bell are with Boise State University, Boise, ID. Bolter is with San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.

Address author correspondence to Laura J. Petranek at LauraJonesPetranek@boisestate.edu.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education
Article Sections
References
  • BellK. & BaleJ. (2013). Got skills? A physical educator’s guide to teaching children skills for a lifetime of movement (2nd ed.). Boise, ID: Bell & Bale PE Solutions.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChiM. (1977). Age differences in memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 23266281. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(77)90104-7

  • ChiM. & GallagherJ. (1982). Speed of processing: A developmental source of limitation. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities 22332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EmanuelM.JarusT. & BartO. (2008). Effect of focus of attention and age on motor acquisition, retention, and transfer: A randomized trial. Physical Therapy 88251260. PubMed ID: 18042657 doi:10.2522/ptj.20060174

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FergusonC. (2009). An effects size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 40532538. doi:10.1037/a0015808

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FlôresF.S.SchildJ.F.G. & ChiviacowskyS. (2015). Benefits of external focus instructions on the learning of a balance task in children of different ages. International Journal of Sport Psychology 46311320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GallagherJ.D. & ThomasJ.R. (1984). Rehearsal strategy effects on developmental differences for recall of a movement series. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 55123128. doi:10.1080/02701367.1984.10608387

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GohT.KantakS. & SullivanK. (2012). Movement pattern and parameter learning in children: Effects of feedback frequency. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 83346352. PubMed ID: 22808721 doi:10.1080/02701367.2012.10599866

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrahamG.Holt/HaleS. & ParkerM. (2013). Children moving: A reflective approach to teaching physical education (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HadlerR.ChiviacowskyC.WulfG. & SchildJ.F.G. (2014). Children’s learning of tennis skills is facilitated by external focus instructions. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física 20418422. doi:10.1590/S1980-65742014000400008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuT. & JensenJ.L. (2011). Effects of strategy use on children’s motor performance in a continuous timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 82198209. PubMed ID: 21699099 doi:10.1080/02701367.2011.10599747

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MasserL. (1993). Critical cues help first-grade students’ achievement in handstands and forward rolls. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 12301312. doi:10.1123/jtpe.12.3.301

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PallantJ. (2013). SPSS survival manual (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • PalmerK.K.MatsuyamaA.L.IrwinM.PorterJ.M. & RobinsonL.E. (2017). The effect of attentional focus cues on object control performance in elementary children. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 22580588. doi:10.1080/17408989.2017.1294667

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PerreaultM.E. & FrenchK.E. (2015). External-focus feedback benefits free-throw learning in children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 86422427. PubMed ID: 26230869 doi:10.1080/02701367.2015.1051613

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PerreaultM.E. & FrenchK.E. (2016). Differences in children’s thinking and learning during attentional focus instruction. Human Movement Science 45154160. PubMed ID: 26638048 doi:10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.013

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RinkJ.E. (2009). Designing the physical education curriculum. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • RinkJ.E. (2013). Teaching physical education for learning (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • SalmoniA.W.SchmidtR.A. & WalterC.B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95355386. PubMed ID: 6399752 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Society of Health and Physical Education (SHAPE America). (2014). National standards & grade-level outcomes for K-12 physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SullivanK.KantakS. & BurtnerP. (2008). Motor learning in children: Feedback effects on skill acquisition. Physical Therapy 88720732. PubMed ID: 18339797 doi:10.2522/ptj.20070196

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TabachnickB.G. & FidellL.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.

  • ThomasJ.R. (1980). Acquisition of motor skills: Information processing differences between children and adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 51158173. PubMed ID: 7394282 doi:10.1080/02701367.1980.10609281

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThomasJ.R. (1984). Children’s motor skill development. In J.R. Thomas (Ed.) Motor development during childhood and adolescence (pp. 91104). Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThomasJ.R. (2000). Children’s control, learning, and performance of motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 7119. PubMed ID: 10763516 doi:10.1080/02701367.2000.10608875

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThornJ. (2006). Using attentional strategies for balance performance and learning in 9–12 year olds (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State UniversityTallahassee, FL.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WatkinsM. & PachecoM. (2000). Interobserver agreement in behavioral research: Importance and calculation. Journal of Behavioral Education 10205212. doi:10.1023/A:1012295615144

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WintherK.T. & ThomasJ.R. (1981). Developmental differences in children’s labeling of movement. Journal of Motor Behavior 137790. PubMed ID: 15201122 doi:10.1080/00222895.1981.10735238

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WulfG. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 677104. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WulfG.ChiviacowskyS.SchillerE. & ÁvilaL. (2010). Frequent external-focus feedback enhances motor learning. Frontiers in Psychology 1190. PubMed ID: 21833250 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00190

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WulfG.McConnelN.GärtnerM. & SchwarzA. (2002). Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior 34171182. PubMed ID: 12057890 doi:10.1080/00222890209601939

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WulfG.McNevinN. & SheaC.H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 5411431154. PubMed ID: 11765737 doi:10.1080/713756012

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WulfG. & PrinzW. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8648660. PubMed ID: 11848583 doi:10.3758/BF03196201

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WulfG. & SheaC. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9185211. PubMed ID: 12120783 doi:10.3758/BF03196276

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 133 134 27
Full Text Views 22 22 8
PDF Downloads 16 16 5
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar