The Standard Model of Talent Development and Its Discontents

in Kinesiology Review

Click name to view affiliation

Richard Bailey
Search for other papers by Richard Bailey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
David Collins
Search for other papers by David Collins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Despite evident differences between approaches to talent development, many share a set of common characteristics and presumptions. We call this the Standard Model of Talent Development (SMTD). This model is articulated and the relevant literature drawn out to highlight the model's strengths and weaknesses. The SMTD has been enormously influential, in terms of both policy documentation and practice, and it retains an obvious common sense appeal. However, we will argue that not only is its attractiveness illusionary and inconsistent to the emerging evidence base from research, but it is also undesirable from a variety of perspectives and desired outcomes. In short, we suggest that the most common system for identifying talent is unsubstantiated from both a process and an outcome perspective.

Bailey is with the Dept. of Sport, Dance, and Outdoor Education, Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom. Collins is with the Institute of Coaching and Performance, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4382 1501 210
Full Text Views 30 11 3
PDF Downloads 39 11 3