Philokinesiology: A Perilous Place for Predictions

in Kinesiology Review

Click name to view affiliation

Scott Kretchmar
Search for other papers by Scott Kretchmar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

In this essay I argue that predictions for the future of the philosophy of sport (as well as kinesiology as a whole) are complicated by at least three factors. These include the emergence of what I identify as “minority voices,” the fact that appearances deceive and that going “backwards” sometimes results in moving forwards, and the emerging realization that those of us in seemingly independent research silos are actually interrelated. Philokinesiologists cannot predict where they are going without knowing where physiokinesiologists, biomeckinesiologists, pedekinesiologists, and others are moving, and visa versa. I describe this uncertain journey as an exciting adventure, one that is made all the more interesting because we will be traveling together.

Kretchmar (NAK Fellow #330) is with the Dept. of Kinesiology, Penn State University, State College, PA.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1461 450 100
Full Text Views 5 5 0
PDF Downloads 11 11 1