Philokinesiology: A Perilous Place for Predictions

in Kinesiology Review
View More View Less
Restricted access

In this essay I argue that predictions for the future of the philosophy of sport (as well as kinesiology as a whole) are complicated by at least three factors. These include the emergence of what I identify as “minority voices,” the fact that appearances deceive and that going “backwards” sometimes results in moving forwards, and the emerging realization that those of us in seemingly independent research silos are actually interrelated. Philokinesiologists cannot predict where they are going without knowing where physiokinesiologists, biomeckinesiologists, pedekinesiologists, and others are moving, and visa versa. I describe this uncertain journey as an exciting adventure, one that is made all the more interesting because we will be traveling together.

Kretchmar (NAK Fellow #330) is with the Dept. of Kinesiology, Penn State University, State College, PA.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1306 400 68
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Downloads 7 7 0