Concussion in Sport: Conceptual and Ethical Issues

Click name to view affiliation

Michael J. McNamee
Search for other papers by Michael J. McNamee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bradley Partridge
Search for other papers by Bradley Partridge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Lynley Anderson
Search for other papers by Lynley Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The issue of concussion in sport is a matter of global public interest that is currently under dispute by educational, legal, and medical professionals and scientists. In this article we discuss the problem from philosophical, bioethical, and sports ethical perspectives. We articulate conceptual differences in approaches to definition and therefore diagnosis of concussion. We critically review similarities and differences in the leading consensus statements that guide the treatment of concussion diagnosis and treatment in sports. We then present a series of ethical problems including issues that relate to paternalistic intervention in the lives of athletes in order to prevent harm to athletes, conflicting and competing interests, and confidentiality.

McNamee is a professor with the College of Engineering, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom. Partridge is a senior research fellow with the Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Anderson is a senior lecturer with the Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3866 891 53
Full Text Views 55 35 2
PDF Downloads 56 28 1