Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Kinesiology: Survey Results from the 2016 AKA Workshop

in Kinesiology Review

Click name to view affiliation

Jason R. Carter
Search for other papers by Jason R. Carter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Penny McCullagh
Search for other papers by Penny McCullagh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Rick Kreider
Search for other papers by Rick Kreider in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Over the past decade, institutions of higher education have been forced to become more innovative and entrepreneurial, seeking creative solutions to budget challenges. This has been particularly important within kinesiology programs, which represent one of the largest growing sectors of higher education over the past 10–15 years. In preparation for the 2016 American Kinesiology Association (AKA) Leadership Workshop, a survey was administered by the AKA to capture key institutional classifications (i.e., Carnegie classification, institutional size, public vs. private designation) and department chair or designated administrator perceptions on entrepreneurial issues relevant to their unit. Sixty-eight of 881 units surveyed responded, yielding a response rate of 7.7%. The majority of respondents (67%) indicated a unit funding model that was based on the previous year’s level (i.e., historical budget model). While the majority of respondents reported that their unit is provided with “adequate to plentiful” resources (59%), this varied widely based on institutional classification. Specifically, baccalaureate institutions (Chi-square 18.054, p < .001) and institutions with < 5,000 students (Chi-square 10.433, p & .015) had the least favorable perceptions of unit resource allocation. For the majority of entrepreneurial activities and partnerships (5 of 8 targeted questions), ≥ 50% of the respondents reported “no involvement.” There was a significant mismatch between actual vs. expected time spent by the department chair on fundraising activities (Chi-square 4.627, p = .031), with higher expectations than actual time spent on fundraising. In summary, the AKA survey suggests that there is tremendous heterogeneity in perceptions of and participation in entrepreneurial activities within kinesiology, and that there remains strategic areas of opportunity within the field.

Carter is with the Department of Kinesiology and Integrative Physiology, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI. McCullagh is with the Department of Kinesiology, California State University East Bay, Hayward, CA. Kreider is with the Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2000 881 0
Full Text Views 9 0 0
PDF Downloads 14 2 0