Moving Forward: Academia, Industry, and Partnerships

in Kinesiology Review

Click name to view affiliation

David D. Pascoe
Search for other papers by David D. Pascoe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Timothy E. Moore
Search for other papers by Timothy E. Moore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The decline in federal research grant funding and incentive-based budget models to support a university’s mission has necessitated a paradigm shift in the pursuit of available sources of funding. Programs built around federal funding are once again pursuing funding opportunities from industry. Universities are reevaluating their research funding models and career expectations (tenure, promotion) that support a researcher, laboratories, and a defined research agenda. Kinesiology departments are in a strong position to pursue industry funding for fitness, sports, and performance-related research. While grant funding focuses on empirical data-driven research, industry looks for product exposure, validation (empirical data to support claims), and commercialization. Industry partnerships can provide funding in supporting research, developing sponsor-named facilities that benefit both parties. With these cooperative efforts come some unique challenges (financial, proprietary, data interpretation, etc.) that must be addressed.

Pascoe is with the School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL. Moore is with Florida A & M University, Tallahassee, FL.

Address author correspondence to David Pascoe at pascodd@auburn.edu.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1405 439 149
Full Text Views 6 3 2
PDF Downloads 7 4 2