Premovement Changes in Corticospinal Excitability of the Biceps Brachii are Not Different Between Arm Cycling and an Intensity-Matched Tonic Contraction

in Motor Control

Click name to view affiliation

David B. CopithorneMemorial University of Newfoundland

Search for other papers by David B. Copithorne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Davis A. FormanMemorial University of Newfoundland

Search for other papers by Davis A. Forman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Kevin E. PowerMemorial University of Newfoundland

Search for other papers by Kevin E. Power in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The purpose of this study was to determine if supraspinal and/or spinal motoneuron excitability of the biceps brachii were differentially modulated before: 1) arm cycling and 2) an intensity-matched tonic contraction. Surface EMG recordings of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) were used to assess supraspinal and spinal motoneuron excitability, respectively. MEP amplitudes were larger and onset latencies shorter, before arm cycling and tonic contraction when compared with rest with no intent to move, but with no difference between motor outputs. CMEP amplitudes and onset latencies remained unchanged before cycling and tonic contraction compared with rest. Premovement enhancement of corticospinal excitability was due to an increase in supraspinal excitability that was not task-dependent. This suggests that a common neural drive is used to initiate both motor outputs with task-dependent changes in neural excitability only being evident once the motor outputs have begun.

The authors are with the School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada.

Address author correspondence to Kevin E. Power at kevin.power@mun.ca.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1724 795 25
Full Text Views 5 0 0
PDF Downloads 3 0 0