Profiling Single-Leg Balance by Leg Preference and Position in Rugby Union Athletes

in Motor Control

Click name to view affiliation

Scott R. BrownAuckland University of Technology

Search for other papers by Scott R. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Matt BrughelliAuckland University of Technology

Search for other papers by Matt Brughelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
, and
Seth LenetskyAuckland University of Technology
Resilience Code, LLC

Search for other papers by Seth Lenetsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
Restricted access

Our aims were to assess single-leg balance in rugby union athletes and compare the stability indices between legs and between positions. Thirty athletes, forwards and backs (n = 15/15), performed single-leg balance measured at two difficulty levels (Level 8: more stable and Level 2: less stable) using the Biodex Balance SD System. The backs’ nonpreferred leg had worse scores in medial–lateral and overall indices (effect size = 1.05 and 0.63) compared with the preferred leg on Level 8 stability. Backs had better scores in all indices in the preferred (effect size = −1.20 to −1.82) and nonpreferred (effect size = −0.66 to −1.36) legs compared with the forwards at both stability difficulties. Asymmetry between the two legs is also present between forwards and backs when examined on an individual basis. This study illuminates the importance of single-leg balance screening among rugby athletes to detect individuals with asymmetries in balance that may increase the risk of lower-extremity injury.

Brown, Brughelli, and Lenetsky are with the Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Lenetsky is also with the Resilience Code, LLC, Englewood, CO.

Address author correspondence to Dr. Scott R. Brown at scott.brown@aut.ac.nz.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (TIF 2.81 MB)
    • Supplemental Materials (TIF 2.31 MB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand