Antipointing Reaches Do Not Adhere to Width-Based Manipulations of Fitts’ (1954) Equation
in Motor ControlClick name to view affiliation
Search for other papers by Marlowe Pecora in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luc Tremblay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthew Heath in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Reaches with overlapping stimulus-response spatial relations (propointing) adhere to speed–accuracy relations as defined by Paul Fitts’ index of difficulty equation (IDFitts: in bits of information). This movement principle is attributed to response mediation via the “fast” visuomotor networks of the dorsal visual pathway. It is, however, unclear whether the executive demands of dissociating stimulus-response spatial relations by reaching mirror-symmetrical to a target (antipointing) elicits similar adherence to Fitts’ equation. Here, pro- and antipointing responses were directed to a constant target amplitude with varying target widths to provide IDFitts values of 3.0, 3.5, 4.3, and 6.3 bits. Propointing movement times linearly increased with IDFitts—a result attributed to visually based trajectory corrections. In contrast, antipointing movement times, deceleration times, and endpoint precision did not adhere to Fitts’ equation. These results indicate that antipointing renders a “slow” and offline mode of control mediated by the visuoperceptual networks of the ventral visual pathway.
Pecora and Heath are with the School of Kinesiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. Tremblay is with the Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
© 2023 Human Kinetics