Between a Walk and a Hard Place: How Stepping Patterns Change While Navigating Environmental Obstacles
Click name to view affiliation
Search for other papers by Ashwini Kulkarni in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chuyi Cui in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shirley Rietdyk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Satyajit Ambike in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Maintaining a consistent relationship between each footfall and the body’s motion is a key mechanism to maintain balance while walking. However, environmental features, for example, puddles/obstacles, impose additional constraints on foot placement. This study investigated how healthy young individuals alter foot placements to simultaneously manage body-centric and environmental constraints during an obstacle-crossing task. Consistent step length promotes balance for all steps, whereas accurate foot placement around the obstacle is essential to avoid a trip. While crossing an obstacle, any error in positioning one foot relative to the obstacle can be compensated by selecting the placement of the subsequent step. However, compensation will necessarily alter step length from its average value. The interstep covariance index computed from two consecutive foot placements was used to quantify this tradeoff between body-centric and environmental constraints for six consecutive steps while approaching, crossing, and resuming unobstructed gait after crossing the obstacle. The index declined only when either one or both feet were adjacent to the obstacle. The decline was driven in part by a tendency toward higher step length variability. Thus, changes in the stepping patterns to address the environmental constraint occurred at the cost of the body-centric constraint. However, the step length never ceased to be controlled; the interstep covariance index was positive for all steps. Overall, participants adapted foot placement control to account for the larger threat to balance. The environmental constraint was prioritized only when a potential trip posed greater threat to balance compared with the threat posed by variable step length.
Kulkarni https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9578-1828
Cui https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0437-323X
Rietdyk https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-3943
Ambike (sambike@purdue.edu) is corresponding author, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-860X
© 2024 Human Kinetics