Role of Massed Versus Distributed Practice in Learning Novel Foreign Language Utterances

in Motor Control
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $76.00

1 year subscription

USD $101.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $144.00

2 year subscription

USD $188.00

The current study compared the role of massed versus distributed practice in learning novel foreign language utterances. Fifty healthy native English-speaking participants were randomly assigned to either massed or distributed practice groups. All participants practiced eight novel French utterances 25 times each for a total of 200 times, with the spacing of practice sessions differing between the two groups. Both the groups completed an immediate retention as well as a delayed retention test. Participants’ learning was evaluated based on phonetic accuracy and naturalness of the French utterances. The findings revealed that participants involved in distributed practice demonstrated better learning over participants involved in massed practice. Future research should aim to extrapolate these findings in treating speech disorders.

Ramesh Kaipa, Howard, and Roha Kaipa are with the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. Turcat and Prema are with the Department of Foreign Languages & Literatures, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.

Ramesh Kaipa (ramesh.kaipa@okstate.edu) is corresponding author.
Motor Control
Article Sections
References
  • AdamsJ.A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behaviour 3111150. doi:

  • AdamsS.G.& PageA.D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 8(4) 215220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BaddeleyA.D. & LongmanD.J.A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics 21(8) 627635. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BloomK.C. & ShuellT.J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Research 74245248. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BortoliL.RobazzaC.DurigonV. & CarraC. (1992). Effects of contextual interference on learning technical sports skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills 75(2) 555562. PubMed ID: 1408620 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrownJ. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 101221. doi:

  • CarrollJ.B. & SaponS. (2002). Modern language aptitude test: Manual. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing.

  • ChallisB.H. (1993). Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 19389396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1) 155159. PubMed ID: 19565683 doi:

  • DailT.K. & ChristinaR.W. (2004). Distribution of practice and metacognition in learning and long-term retention of a discrete motor task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 75(2) 148155. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DonovanJ.J. & RadosevichD.J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t. Journal of Applied Psychology 84(5) 795805. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DorfbergerS.Adi-JaphaE. & KarniA. (2009). Sex differences in motor performance and motor learning in children and adolescents: An increasing male advantage in motor learning and consolidation phase gains. Behavioural Brain Research 198(1) 165171. PubMed ID: 19026692 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.G. & BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39(2) 175191. PubMed ID: 17695343 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • France Diplomatie. (2018). Francophony and the French Language. Retrieved from https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/french-foreign-policy/francophony-and-the-french-language/

    • Export Citation
  • GalekK.E. & WattersonT. (2017). Perceptual anchors and the dispersion of nasality ratings. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 54(4) 423430. PubMed ID: 27043649 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoodeS. & MagillR.A. (1986). Contextual interference effects in learning three badminton serves. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 57(4) 308314. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GreenoJ.G. (1967). Paired-associate learning with short-term retention: Mathematical analysis and data regarding identification of parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4430472. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GuadagnoliM.A. & LeeT.D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 36(2) 212224. PubMed ID: 15130871 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JacobyL.L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17649667. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KaipaR. (2016). Is there an interaction between task complexity and practice variability in speech-motor learning? Annals of Neurosciences 23(3) 134138. PubMed ID: 27721581 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KaipaR.RobbM. & JonesR. (2017). The effectiveness of constant, variable, random, and blocked practice in speech-motor learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development 5(1) 103125. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KangS. (2016). Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: Policy implications for instruction. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(1) 1219. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KimI.S.KangH.S.PirruccelloL.KweonS. & OhC. (2017). Motor learning theory-based approach for teaching English as a second language. Speech Language and Hearing 20(2) 6370. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KimI.S.LaPointeL.L. & StierwaltJ.A.G. (2012). The effect of feedback and practice on the acquisition of novel speech behaviors. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 21(2) 89100. PubMed ID: 22230183 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeeT.D. & GenoveseE.D. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Learning and performance effects reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 59277287. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LitmanL. & DavachiL. (2010). Distributed learning enhances relational memory consolidation. Learning & Memory 15711716. doi:

  • MaasE.BarlowJ.RobinD. & ShapiroL. (2002). Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity. Aphasiology 16(4–6) 609622. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MaasE. & FarinellaK.A. (2012). Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 55(2) 561578 . doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MaasE.RobinD.A.HulaS.N.A.FreedmanS.E.WulfG.BallardK.J. & SchmidtR.A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 17277298. PubMed ID: 18663111 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MaddoxG.B. (2016). Understanding the underlying mechanism of the spacing effect in verbal learning: A case for encoding variability and study-phase retrieval. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 28684706. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MagillR.A. (2004). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • McGaughJ.L. (2000). Memory-a century of consolidation. Science 287(5451) 248251. PubMed ID: 10634773 doi:

  • NamasivayamA.K.PukonenM.GoshulakD.HardJ.RudziczF.RietveldT.van LieshoutP. (2015). Treatment intensity and childhood apraxia of speech. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 50(4) 529546. PubMed ID: 25581372 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OatesJ. (2009). Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality: Pros, cons and future directions. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 614956. PubMed ID: 19204393 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PerrierP.OstryD.J. & LaboissièreR. (1996). The equilibrium point hypothesis and its application to speech motor control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39365378. PubMed ID: 8729923 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RohrerD. & TaylorK. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practise on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20(9) 12091224. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ScheinerL.R.SadagopanN. & SherwoodD.E. (2014). Effects of blocked versus random practice on speech motor skill acquisition and retention. Journal of Motor Learning and Development 2(2) 2936. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchmidtR.A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 82225260. doi:

  • SchmidtR.A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

  • SheaC.H.LaiQ.BlackC. & ParkJ.-H. (2000). Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Human Movement Science 19(5) 737760. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SimmonsA.L. (2012). Distributed practice and procedural memory consolidation in musicians’ skill learning. Journal of Research in Music Education 59357368. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SkeltonS.L. & HagopianA.L. (2014). Using randomized variable practice in the treatment of childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 23(4) 599611. PubMed ID: 25017177 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SpielmanJ.RamigL.O.MahlerL.HalpernA. & GavinW.J. (2007). Effects of an extended version of the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment on voice and speech in Parkinson’s disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1695107. PubMed ID: 17456888 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StelmachG.E. (1969). Efficiency of motor learning as a function of intertrial rest. The Research Quarterly 40(1) 198202. PubMed ID: 5252444

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThelenE. & UlrichB.D. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 56(1) 104. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WalkerM.P. (2005). A refined model of sleep and the time course of memory formation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2851104. PubMed ID: 16047457

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WambaughJ.L.NesslerC.CameronR. & MauszyckiS.C. (2013). Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Examination of treatment intensity and practice schedule. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 22(1) 84102. PubMed ID: 23071199 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WrightB.A. & SabinA.T. (2007). Perceptual learning: How much daily training is enough? Experimental Brain Research 180727736. PubMed ID: 17333009 doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 133 133 48
Full Text Views 13 13 6
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar