Validity of the Actical Accelerometer Step-Count Function in Children

in Pediatric Exercise Science

Click name to view affiliation

Richard R. RosenkranzKansas State University, University of Western Sydney

Search for other papers by Richard R. Rosenkranz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sara K. RosenkranzKansas State University, University of Western Sydney

Search for other papers by Sara K. Rosenkranz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Casey WeberKansas State University

Search for other papers by Casey Weber in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This study sought to assess criterion validity of the Actical monitor step-count function in children via ankle and waist placement, compared with observed video recordings. Children attending a summer program (12 boys, 7 girls, mean age = 9.6yrs, range 7–11yrs) wore two synchronized Acticals, attached at the ankle (AA) and waist (AW). Children performed treadmill walking at varying speeds, and two research assistants counted steps using observed video recordings (OVR). Results showed high correlations for AW-OVR (r = .927, p < .001) and AA-OVR (r = .854, p < .001), but AW and AA were significantly lower than OVR (t > 11.2, p < .001). AW provided better step estimates than AA for step rates above 130 steps per minute. In contrast, AA was superior to AW for slow walking, and measured more steps during the (nontreadmill) program time. Overall, the Actical monitor showed good evidence of validity as a measure of steps in children for population-based studies.

R. Rosenkranz and S. Rosenkranz are with Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, and University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia. Weber is with Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1135 538 145
Full Text Views 11 2 0
PDF Downloads 15 3 0