Real World, Real People: Can We Assess Walking on a Treadmill to Establish Step Count Recommendations in Adolescents?

in Pediatric Exercise Science
Mhairi J. MacDonald*,1, Samantha G. Fawkner*,2, Ailsa G. Niven*,2, and David Rowe*,3
View More View Less
  • 1 Edge Hill University
  • | 2 The University of Edinburgh
  • | 3 University of Strathclyde
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2018-0213
Keywords:
ambulatory activity; cadence; assessment mode; youth; guidelines
In Print:
Volume 31: Issue 4
Page Range:
488–494
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $70.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $94.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $134.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $178.00
Subscribe to this Journal

  • Purchase article

    USD  $24.95

  • Student 1 year online subscription

    USD  $70.00

  • 1 year online subscription

    USD  $94.00

  • Student 2 year online subscription

    USD  $134.00

  • 2 year online subscription

    USD  $178.00

Background: Currently, it is not known how much walking should be advocated for good health in an adolescent population. Step count recommendations for minimum time in moderate-intensity activity have been translated predominantly from treadmill walking. Purpose: To compare the energy cost of walking on a treadmill with overground walking in adolescent girls. Methods: A total of 26 adolescent girls undertook resting metabolic measurements for individual determination of 1 metabolic equivalent using indirect calorimetry. Energy expenditure was subsequently assessed during treadmill and overground walking at slow, moderate, and fast walking speeds for 4 to 6 minutes. Treadmill step rates were matched overground using a metronome. Results: The energy cost of treadmill walking was found to be significantly greater than and not equivalent to overground walking at 133 steps per minute; (equivalent to the fast walking pace): V˙O2 3.90 (2.78–5.01), P < .001, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 18.18%, and metabolic equivalent 0.77 (0.54–1.00), P < .001, MAPE = 18.16%. The oxygen cost per step (V˙O2 mL·step−1) was significantly greater and not equivalent on the treadmill at 120 and 133 steps per minute: 0.43 (0.12–0.56), P < .05, MAPE = 10.12% versus 1.40 (1.01–1.76), P < .001, MAPE = 17.64%, respectively. Conclusion: The results suggest that there is a difference in energy cost per step of walking on a treadmill and overground at the same step rate. This should be considered when utilizing the treadmill in energy expenditure studies. Studies which aim to provide step recommendations should focus on overground walking where most walking activity is adopted.

MacDonald is with the Department of Sport & Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom. Fawkner and Niven are with the Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Institute for Sport, Physical Education & Health Sciences, Moray House School of Education, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. Rowe was previously with the School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.

MacDonald (Mhairi.MacDonald@edgehill.ac.uk) is corresponding author.

Pediatric Exercise Science

Cover Pediatric Exercise Science
  • 1.

    Abel M, Hannon J, Mullineaux D, Beighle A. Determination of step rate thresholds corresponding to physical activity intensity classifications in adults. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8:45–51. PubMed ID: 21297184 doi:10.1123/jpah.8.1.45

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2010: 81.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Beets MW, Agiovlasitis S, Fahs CA, Ranadive SM, Fernhall B. Adjusting step count recommendations for anthropometric variations in leg length. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:509–12. PubMed ID: 20096631 doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2009.11.002

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Berryman N, Gayda M, Nigam A, Juneau M, Bherer L, Bosquet L. Comparison of the metabolic energy cost of overground and treadmill walking in older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(5):1613–20. PubMed ID: 21863296 doi:10.1007/s00421-011-2102-1

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 1988.

  • 6.

    Dal U, Erdogan T, Resitoglu B, Beydagi H. Determination of preferred walking speed on treadmill may lead to high oxygen cost on treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2010;31:366–9. PubMed ID: 20129785 doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Department of Health. Start Active, Stay Active: A Report on Physical Activity from the Four Home Countries’ Chief Medical Officers. London, UK; Department of Health and Social Care; 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/start-active-stay-active-a-report-on-physical-activity-from-the-four-home-countries-chief-medical-officers. Accessed December 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Dixon PM, Saint-Maurice PF, Kim Y, Hibbing P, Bai Y, Welk GJ. A Primer on the use of the equivalence testing for evaluation measurement agreement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:837–45. PubMed ID: 29135817 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001481

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Duncan JS, Schofield G, Duncan EK. Step count recommendations for children based on body fat. Prev Med. 2007;44:42–4. PubMed ID: 17011618 doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.08.009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Fawkner SG, Niven A, Thin AG, MacDonald M.J., Oakes JR. Adolescent girls’ energy expenditure during dance simulation active computer gaming. J Sport Sci. 2010;28(1):61–5. doi:10.1080/02640410903369935

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Graser SV, Groves A, Prusak KA, Pennington TR. Pedometer steps-per-minute, moderate intensity, and individual differences in 12- to 14-year-old youth. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8:272–8. PubMed ID: 21415454 doi:10.1123/jpah.8.2.272

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Graser SV, Pangrazi RP, Vincent WJ. Step it up: activity intensity using pedometers. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 2009;80:22–4.

  • 13.

    Harrell JS, McMurray RG, Baggett CD, Pennell ML, Pearce PF, Bangdiwala SI. Energy costs of physical activities in children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(2):329–36. PubMed ID: 15692331 doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000153115.33762.3F

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Harrington DM, Dowd KP, Tudor-Locke C, Donnelly AE. A step/minute value for moderate intensity physical activity in adolescent females. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012;24:399–408.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Holt KG, Hamill J, Andres RO. Predicting the minimal energy costs of human walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23(4):491–8. PubMed ID: 1905381 doi:10.1249/00005768-199104000-00016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Holt KJ, Jeng SF, Ratcliffe R, Hamill J. Energetic cost and stability during human walking at the preferred stride velocity. J Mot Behav. 1995;27(2):164–78. PubMed ID: 12736125 doi:10.1080/00222895.1995.9941708

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Jago R, Watson K, Baranowski T, Zakeri I, Yoo S, Baranowski J, Conry K. Pedometer reliability, validity and daily activity targets among 10- to 15-year-old boys. J Sports Sci. 2006;24:241–51. PubMed ID: 16368634 doi:10.1080/02640410500141661

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Jamovi Project [Computer software]. Version 0.8 Jamovi; 2017. Retrieved from http://www.jamovi.org/download.html

  • 19.

    Jones AM, Doust JH. A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sport Sci. 1996;14(4):321–7. doi:10.1080/02640419608727717

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Kim Y, Welk GJ. Criterion validity of competing accelerometry-based activity monitoring devices. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(11):2456–63. PubMed ID: 25910051 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000691

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Lee JM, Kim Y, Welk GJ. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(9):1840–8. PubMed ID: 24777201 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000287

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Collins CE, Boreham CA, Callister R. The relationship between heart rate intensity and pedometer step counts in adolescents. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:591–7. PubMed ID: 19308872 doi:10.1080/02640410802676687

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Malatesta D, Simar D, Dauvilliers Y, Candau R, Ben Saad H, Préfaut C, Caillaud C. Aerobic determinants of the decline in preferred walking speed in healthy, active 65- and 80-year-olds. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447(6):915–21. PubMed ID: 14666424 doi:10.1007/s00424-003-1212-y

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Marshall SJ, Levy SS, Tudor-Locke CE, et al. . Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:410–5. PubMed ID: 19362695 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.021

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Mian OS, Thom JM, Ardigò LP, Morse CI, Narici MV, Minetti AE. Effect of a 12-month physical conditioning programme on the metabolic cost of walking in healthy older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;100(5):499–505. PubMed ID: 16463043 doi:10.1007/s00421-006-0141-9

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Morgan CF, Tsuchida AR, Beets MW, Hetzler RK, Stickley CD. Step-rate recommendations for moderate-intensity walking on overweight/obese and healthy weight children. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12:370–5. PubMed ID: 24829045 doi:10.1123/jpah.2013-0130

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Morris JN, Hardman AE. Walking to health. Sports Med. 1997;23:306–32. PubMed ID: 9181668 doi:10.2165/00007256-199723050-00004

  • 28.

    Parvataneni K, Ploeg L, Olney SJ, Brouwer B. Kinematic, kinetic and metabolic parameters of treadmill versus overground walking in healthy older adults. Clin Biomech. 2009;24(1):95–100. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.07.002

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Rose J, Ralston HJ, Gamble JG. Energetics of walking. In: Rose J, Gamble JG, editors. Human Walking. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Rowe DA, Welk GJ, Heil DP, Mahar MT, Kemble CD, Calabró MA, Camenisch K. Stride rate recommendations for moderate intensity walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):312–8. PubMed ID: 20543754 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e9d99a

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Saint-Maurice PF, Anderson K, Bai Y, Welk GJ. Agreement between VO2peak predicted from pacer and one-mile run time—equated laps. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016;87(4):421–6. PubMed ID: 27586563 doi:10.1080/02701367.2016.1216067

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987;15(6):657–80. PubMed ID: 3450848 doi:10.1007/BF01068419

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Tudor-Locke C, Hatano Y, Pangrazi RP, Kang M. Revisiting “How many steps are enough”? Med Sci Sport and Exerc. 2008;40:S537–43. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c7133

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Tudor-Locke C, Schuna JM Jr, Han H, et al. . Cadence (step/min) and intensity during ambulation in 6-20 year olds: the CADENCE-kids study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15:20. PubMed ID: 29482554 doi:10.1186/s12966-018-0651-y

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Tudor-Locke C, Sisson SB, Collova T, Lee SM, Swan PD. Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005;30:666–76. PubMed ID: 16485518 doi:10.1139/h05-147

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Van de Putte M, Hagemeister N, St-Onge N, Parent G, de Guise JA. Habituation to treadmill walking. Biomed Mater Eng. 2006;16(1):43–52. PubMed ID: 16410643

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    VanSwearingen JM, Perera S, Brach JS, Cham R, Rosano C, Studenski SA. A randomized trial of two forms of therapeutic activity to improve walking: effect on the energy cost of walking. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(11):1190–8. PubMed ID: 19643842 doi:10.1093/gerona/glp098

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Warabi T, Kato M, Kiriyama K, Yoshida T, Kobayashi N. Treadmill walking and overground walking of human subjects compared by recording sole-floor reaction force. Neurosci Res. 2005;53(3):343–8. PubMed ID: 16182398 doi:10.1016/j.neures.2005.08.005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Weir JB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 1949;109(1–2):1–9. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004363

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Welk GJ, Kim Y, Stanfill B, et al. . Validity of 24-h physical activity recall: physical activity measurement survey. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(10):2014–24. PubMed ID: 24561818 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000314

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    World Health Organization. Physical activity fact-sheet. 2018. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity. Accessed November 13, 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 987 420 30
Full Text Views 24 3 0
PDF Downloads 17 2 0