The Experimental Effect of Parent Versus Peer Influence on Children’s Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior

in Pediatric Exercise Science

Click name to view affiliation

Mallory Kobak Kent State University
Hiram College

Search for other papers by Mallory Kobak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Andrew Lepp Kent State University

Search for other papers by Andrew Lepp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Michael Rebold Kent State University
Hiram College

Search for other papers by Michael Rebold in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
,
Ellen Glickman Kent State University

Search for other papers by Ellen Glickman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
, and
Jacob E. Barkley Kent State University

Search for other papers by Jacob E. Barkley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
*
Restricted access

Purpose: To assess children’s physical activity, sedentary behavior, liking, and motivation during 3 separate simulated recess conditions: playing alone, with their parent participating, and with their peer participating. Methods: Children participated in the 3 separate conditions. During each condition, the children had access to an outdoor playground and sedentary activity options for 30 minutes. Accelerometry recorded the physical activity. Time allocated to sedentary options was monitored via a stopwatch. A visual analog scale was used to assess liking, and motivation was assessed as the children’s willingness to participate in an additional 10 minutes of each condition. Results: The children sat 88% less and were 33% more physically active with their peer versus playing alone. The children also sat 65% less during the parent condition than alone. Lastly, the children reported ≥34% liking and were ≥2-fold more likely to participate in the additional 10-minute activity bout during the parent and peer conditions than alone. The differences were significant (P ≤ .05) except for the children’s decision to participate in the additional 10 minutes in the parent versus the alone condition (P = .058). Conclusions: Relative to the alone condition, the presence of a peer or parent reduced sedentary behavior and increased liking and the motivation to participate in that condition. However, only the presence of a peer increased physical activity versus alone.

Kobak, Lepp, Rebold, Glickman, and Barkley are with Exercise Science, College of Education, Health and Human Services, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA. Lepp is also with Recreation, Parks and Tourism Management, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA. Kobak and Rebold are also with Integrative Exercise Science, Hiram College, Hiram, OH, USA.

Barkley (jbarkle1@kent.edu) is corresponding author.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Barkley JE, Roemmich JN. Validity of the CALER and OMNI-bike ratings of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(4):760766. PubMed ID: 18317367 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318161729b

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Barkley JE, Salvy SJ, Roemmich JN. The effect of simulated ostracism on physical activity behavior in children. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e659e666. PubMed ID: 22311997 doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0496

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Barkley JE, Salvy SJ, Sanders GJ, Dey S, Von Carlowitz KP, Williamson ML. Peer influence and physical activity behavior in young children: an experimental study. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(2):404409. PubMed ID: 23359051 doi:10.1123/jpah.2011-0376

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Beets MW, Cardinal BJ, Alderman BL. Parental social support and the physical activity-related behaviors of youth: a review. Health Educ Behav. 2010;37(5):621644. PubMed ID: 20729347 doi:10.1177/1090198110363884

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Berridge KC. Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20(1):125. PubMed ID: 8622814 doi:10.1016/0149-7634(95)00033-B

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Berridge KC, Robinson TE. The mind of an addicted brain: neural sensitization of wanting versus liking. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1995;4(3):7175. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772316

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):123132. PubMed ID: 25599350 doi:10.7326/M14-1651

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Cheng LA, Mendonca G, Farias Junior JC. Physical activity in adolescents: analysis of the social influence of parents and friends. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2014;90(1):3541. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2013.05.006

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1969.

  • 11.

    Dunton GF, Liao Y, Almanza E, et al. Joint physical activity and sedentary behavior in parent-child pairs. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(8):14731480. PubMed ID: 22367744 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825148e9

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Eccles JS. The development of children ages 6 to 14. Future of children. 1999;9(2):3044. doi:10.2307/1602703

  • 13.

    Elkin F, Handel G. The Child and Society: The Process of Socialization. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1988.

  • 14.

    Faith MS, Leone MA, Ayers TS, Heo M, Pietrobelli A. Weight criticism during physical activity, coping skills, and reported physical activity in children. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2):e23. PubMed ID: 12165622 doi:10.1542/peds.110.2.e23

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Farley TA, Meriwether RA, Baker ET, Rice JC, Webber LS. Where do the children play? The influence of playground equipment on physical activity of children in free play. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(2):319. PubMed ID: 18382040 doi:10.1123/jpah.5.2.319

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Fennell C, Lepp A, Barkley J. Smartphone use predicts being an “Active Couch Potato” in sufficiently active adults. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2019:1559827619861383. doi:10.1177/1559827619861383

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Freedson P, Pober D, Janz KF. Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S523S530. PubMed ID: 16294115 doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185658.28284.ba

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Hohepa M, Scragg R, Schofield G, Kolt GS, Schaaf D. Social support for youth physical activity: Importance of siblings, parents, friends and school support across a segmented school day. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4(1):54. PubMed ID: 17996070 doi:10.1186/1479-5868-4-54

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Kimm SY, Glynn NW, Kriska AM, et al. Longitudinal changes in physical activity in a biracial cohort during adolescence. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(8):14451454. PubMed ID: 10949011 doi:10.1097/00005768-200008000-00013

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Kvaavik E, Tell GS, Klepp KI. Predictors and tracking of body mass index from adolescence into adulthood: follow-up of 18 to 20 years in the Oslo Youth Study. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(12):12121218. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.12.1212

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Lepp A, Barkley JE. Cell phone use predicts being an “active couch potato”: results from a cross-sectional survey of sufficiently active college students. Digit. Health. 2019;5:2055207619844870. PubMed ID: 31019724 doi:10.1177/2055207619844870

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Morgan PJ, Young MD, Barnes AT, Eather N, Pollock ER, Lubans DR. Engaging fathers to increase physical activity in girls: the “dads and daughters exercising and empowered” (DADEE) randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2018;53(1):3952. doi:10.1093/abm/kay015

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105113. PubMed ID: 20577058 doi:10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Page RM, Frey J, Talbert R, Falk C. Children’s feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction: relationship to measures of phsyical fitness and activity. J Teach Phys Educ. 1992;11(3):211219. doi:10.1123/jtpe.11.3.211

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Prochaska JJ, Rodgers MW, Sallis JF. Association of parent and peer support with adolescent physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(2):206210. PubMed ID: 12092896 doi:10.1080/02701367.2002.10609010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Rebold MJ, Lepp A, Kobak MS, McDaniel J, Barkley JE. The Effect of parental involvement on children’s physical activity. J Pediatr. 2016;170:206210. PubMed ID: 26725460 doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.11.072

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Richardson JTE. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ Res Rev. 2011;6(2):135147. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Rittenhouse M, Salvy SJ, Barkley JE. The effect of peer influence on the amount of physical activity performed in 8- to 12-year-old boys. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2011;23(1):4960. PubMed ID: 21467590 doi:10.1123/pes.23.1.49

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Boer NF, et al. Children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(2):4528. PubMed ID: 10694131 doi:10.1097/00005768-200002000-00029

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Roemmich JN, Barkley JE, Epstein LH, Lobarinas CL, White TM, Foster JH. Validity of PCERT and OMNI walk/run ratings of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(5):10141019. PubMed ID: 16672857 doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000218123.81079.49

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Roemmich JN, Barkley JE, Lobarinas CL, Foster JH, White TM, Epstein LH. Association of liking and reinforcing value with children’s physical activity. Physiol Behav. 2008;93(4-5):10111018. PubMed ID: 18289620 doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.01.010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Sallis JF, Berry CC, Broyles SL, McKenzie TL, Nader PR. Variability and tracking of physical activity over 2 yr in young children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27(7):10421049. PubMed ID: 7564971 doi:10.1249/00005768-199507000-00013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:963975. PubMed ID: 10795788 doi:10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Salvy S-J, Bowker JC, Germeroth L, Barkley J. Influence of peers and friends on overweight/obese youths physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2012;40(3):127132 PubMed ID: 22543686 doi:10.1097/JES.0b013e31825af07b

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Salvy SJ, Bowker JW, Roemmich JN, et al. Peer Influence on children’s physical activity: an experience sampling study. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33(1):3949. PubMed ID: 17525088 doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsm039

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Salvy SJ, Roemmich JN, Bowker JC, Romero ND, Stadler PJ, Epstein LH. Effect of peers and friends on youth physical activity and motivation to be physically active. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;34(2):217225. PubMed ID: 18617572 doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn071

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Sanders G, Peacock C, Williamson ML, Wilson K, Carnes A, Barkley JE. The effect of friendship groups on children’s physical activity: an experimental study. J Behav Health. 2014;3(2):95100. doi:10.5455/jbh.20140424022157

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Sawilowsky SS. New effect size rules of thumb. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2009;8(2):597599. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1257035100

  • 39.

    Smith AL. Perceptions of peer relationships and physical activity participation in early adolescence. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1999;21(4):329350. doi:10.1123/jsep.21.4.329

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(2):42631. PubMed ID: 10694127 doi:10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(4):629633. PubMed ID: 9565947 doi:10.1097/00005768-199804000-00023

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Van Der Horst K, Paw MJ, Twisk JW, Van Mechelen W. A brief review on correlates of physical activity and sedentariness in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):12411250. PubMed ID: 17762356 doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e318059bf35

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Wu TY, Pender N. Determinants of physical activity among Taiwanese adolescents: an application of the health promotion model. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25(1):2536. PubMed ID: 11807917 doi:10.1002/nur.10021

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Wu XY, Han LH, Zhang JH, Luo S, Hu JW, Sun K. The influence of physical activity, sedentary behavior on health-related quality of life among the general population of children and adolescents: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187668. PubMed ID: 29121640 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187668

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1810 790 19
Full Text Views 61 23 1
PDF Downloads 93 31 3